Volume 15 (2023)
Volume 14 (2022)
Volume 13 (2021)
Volume 12 (2020)
Volume 11 (2019)
Volume 10 (2018)
Volume 9 (2017)
Volume 8 (2016)
Volume 7 (2015)
Volume 6 (2014)
Volume 5 (2013)
Volume 4 (2012)
Volume 3 (2011)
Volume 2 (2010)
Volume 1 (2009)
Codification of the Principles and Basics of Designing Higher Educational Spaces with an Emphasis on the Cultural and Social Factors

B. Dariush; S. Jalili Sadrabad; N. Taghavian; Sh. Mohammadi Oujan

Volume 11, Issue 2 , April 2019, , Pages 151-181

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2019.3359.3600

Abstract
  Artificial space and environment play important roles in the formation of identity, intellectual and cultural structure and the lifestyle of the individuals and can influence the creation, intensification and/or reduction of their psychological and social problems. The present study has been prepared ...  Read More

Interdisciplinary
Identity: A Heritage from the Past or a Choice for the Future?

N. Taghavian

Volume 9, Issue 3 , July 2017, , Pages 111-123

https://doi.org/10.22631/isih.2017.2155.2647

Abstract
  Is identity a heritage inherited from the past or a choice for the future? In this question, the concept of ‘time’ is presupposed. Thus, my point of departure is analyzing the concept of time. Then the relation between the concept of time and social theory will be examined to maintain ...  Read More

Empirical Pragmatics and Normativity Deficit: The Contribution of Universal Pragmatics to Foreign Language Education

Nasser Taghavian; Yahya Ghaedi; Said Zarghami; Javad Gholami

Volume 6, Issue 3 , September 2014, , Pages 77-116

https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2014.23.004

Abstract
  In this article, on the basis of Habermas’ universal pragmatics, we have tried to indicate that empirical pragmatics in linguistics, suffers from ‘normativity deficit’ in the field of foreign language education. What we mean by ‘normativity deficit’, is the lack of normative ...  Read More

“Critical Hermeneutics” as the Methodical Pre-condition of Interdisciplinary Studies

Naseraldin ali Taghavian

Volume 3, Issue 4 , October 2011, , Pages 21-44

https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2011.12.002

Abstract
  The major problem in conducting interdisciplinary research projects is that in these projects two methodological model deploy against each other: quantitative method used in natural sciences on the one hand, and qualitative method used in human and social sciences on the other hand. As a result of such ...  Read More