Social Sciences
Ali Reza Zargar; Reza Abdolrahmani; Hojat Motaghi; Nahid Hoseini
Abstract
The nature of the insurance industry and the accumulation of liquid assets in the form of deposit boxes can provide fraud from insurance companies. The fraudulent type of fake accidents with various tricks to obtain financial benefits and abuse of third-party insurance has caused a lot of damage to insurance ...
Read More
The nature of the insurance industry and the accumulation of liquid assets in the form of deposit boxes can provide fraud from insurance companies. The fraudulent type of fake accidents with various tricks to obtain financial benefits and abuse of third-party insurance has caused a lot of damage to insurance companies. The purpose of this study is to discover and figure out how fraudulent models are used by third-party insurers to gain access to fraudsters' practices.
Data collection is based on documents and records, interviews with a number of fraudulent women and collaborators with gangs, experts and traffic officers. Individual, familial, social, economic, political, and cultural factors are an effective and motivating factor for criminals, but the most important factor can be considered as economic factor and poverty.
Also, fraudsters with abuse of legal weaknesses and sometimes the use of non-Iranians (Afghans), poor families, to forge a false identity card, and through responsible individuals and influence on government agencies and insurance companies, gain huge amounts of Diyah From insurance companies.
Sociology
zeinab shafiei
Abstract
The answer to the question why one person becomes an entrepreneur and others not is not at all simple. Most of the researchers accepted this puzzle and presented their own definition of the concept of entrepreneurship. Therefore, entrepreneurship is a very controversial term that has made it difficult ...
Read More
The answer to the question why one person becomes an entrepreneur and others not is not at all simple. Most of the researchers accepted this puzzle and presented their own definition of the concept of entrepreneurship. Therefore, entrepreneurship is a very controversial term that has made it difficult to gather theories related to this field. Among the various and sometimes contradictory ideas in the field of entrepreneurship, the contribution of social sciences such as sociology and economic history is significant. But the views of these two sciences are different on the issue of entrepreneurship. These differences have formed the dual perception of less than social limit and more than social limit, which many believe that both of these organizations are incomplete. Sociology is based on the understanding that sees individual agency as more than social, economics uses the understanding that humans are less than social. Therefore, the duality of under-socialized perception and over-socialized perception is synonymous with the controversy over Koran's description of an elephant in the dark, touched by them from different angles, and each person presents his or her own point of view to refute the other. does Therefore, the explanation of this duality and the subsequent comparison of the approach of sociology and economics to the problem of entrepreneurship is the aim of this article. This article is basically of a theoretical nature and is included in the essence of these reflections. The point of departure of this article is to use the new socio-economic paradigm so that entrepreneurship can be understood in a social and historical context.