Abstract

Planning is one of the human occupations in his social life but its conception has been changed along with social changes. Today, university planning is facing crisis regarding its complex situation: so liner approach in planning cant anwer to the university systems reform and perception. In most "developing countries", imitation approach from the industrial specific and unique situation. The important thing is planning thought which attend to past, present and future dynamic communication in university situation. if until now future was an important thing for the planning, after this, dialectic of past, present and future will be determine in planning. Planning thought with emphasize on university dynamic realities based on their background profit from different science and techniques for planning in university development therefore the planning for the university development has been situated in the interdisciplinary area. This article, delibrate on university complex systems and critique liner approach in higher education and universities planning; So, in this study planning thought is examining as an interdisciplinary and creative issue in the development planning of university.

Keywords

Alavipur, S. M. (Ed.) (1372/1993). Čalešhā va češmandāzhā-ye motāle’āt-e miyānreātei [Challenges and outlooks of interdisciplinary studies]. Tehran, Iran: Pažuheškade-ye Motāle’āt-e farhangi va ejtemā’i.
Alvāni, S. M. (1384/2005). Modiriyat-e Omumi [Public Mannagement] (2nd ed.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Ney.
Bazrafšān Moqaddam, M., Nuršāhi, V., & Puršāfe’i, H. (1384/2005). Negareš-e roasā-ye dānešgāhhā be barnāmerizi-ye dānešgāhi dar Iran [University director attitude on education planning in Iran]. Motāle’āt-e Tarbiyati va Ravānšenāsi, 6(2), 93-124.
Foyuzat, Y. (1356/1977). Mabāni-ye Barnāmerizi-ye Amuzši [The principles of an educational planning]. Tehran, Iran: Dānešgāh-e Sepāhiyān-e Enqelāb.
Godet, M. (1985). Perspective de la planification strategique., paris: Economica.
Kesteman, J. P. (2003). L’un, le multiple et le complexe. L’universite et la transdisciplinaire. In Actes du congress int. de la pedagogie universitaire. Canada: Universite de Sherbrook.
Le Thanh, K. (1987). Jeunesse exploite jeunesse perdue?. Paris: P. U. F.
Le, Thanh, K. (1384/1969). Siyāsat Elmi va masā’el-e āmuzeš-e āli-ye Irān [] (M,. Farman, Trans.). Tehran: Vezārat-e Farhang va Āmuzeš-e Āli.
Le, Thanh, K. (1385/2006). Āmuzeš va parvareš-e tatbiqi [Comparative education study] (M. Yamani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Samt.
Lemoigne, J. L. (1977). Theorie du system general. Paris: P.U.F.
Minrzberg, H. (1994). Grandeur et decadence de la planification fstrategique. Paris: Dunod.
Morin, E. (1379/2000). Darāmadi bar andiše-ye pičide [Introduction à la pensée complexe] (A. Jahāndide, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Ney.
Morin, E., & et al (1387/2008). Andiše-ye pičide va raveš-e yādgiri dar asr-e sayyārei [Eduquer pour lere planetaire: lapensee complexe comme method d’apprentissage] (M. Yamani, Trans.). Tehran: Pažuheškade-ye Motāle’āt-e Farhangi va Ejtemā’i.
Morin, E., et al (1382/2003). Haft dāneš-e zaruri barāye amuzeš va parvareš-e āyande [Les sept saviors necessaires a leducation du future] (M. Yamani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Danešgāh-e Šahid Behešti.
Nicolescu, B. (1996). La Trsnseisciplinarite manifeste. Monaco: Le Rocher.
Nursahi, N., & Yamani, M. (1385/2006). Barresi-ye rābete-ye sabk-e šenaxti va sabk-e rahbari dar miyān-e ro’asā-ye dānešgāhhā va moassesat-e āmuzeš-e āli. Pažuheš va Barnāmerizi dar Āmuzeš-e Āli [A Study of Relationship between Cognitive and Leadership Style of the Presidents of Iranian Universities and Institutions of Higher Education]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12(3), 17-36.
Prigogoine, I., & Stengers (1986). La nouvelle alliance. Paris: Galimmard Folio.
Saimon, H. A. (2004). Les sciences de l’artificiel. Paris: ed. Gallimard.
Sinclair, A. (1990). Archetypes of Leadership. Leadership, 1(4), 387-406. doi: 10.1177/1742715005057231.
Yamani, M. (1382/2003). Barnāmerizi Towse’e-ye dānešgāhi [University development planning]. In Barresei-ye erteqā’e keyfiat-e āmuzešhā-ye dānešgāhi (pp. 195-201). Tehran, Iran: Dānešgāh-e Šahid Behešti.
Yamani, M., & Araste, H. (1384/2005). Rāhnamā-ye Barnāmerizi-ye towse’e-ye dānešgāhi [University development planning handbook]. Tehran, Iran: Mo’assese-ye Pažuheš va Barnāmerizi-ye Āmuzes-e Āli.
Yamani, M., (1378/1999). Zarurat va Ahamiyat-e motāle’āt va pažuhešhā-ye tatbiqi dar amužeš va parvareš [The necessity and importance of comparative researches in education]. Ta’lim va Tarbiyat, 3, 43-60.
CAPTCHA Image