Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

S.A. Asghari

Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Ethics and Education, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2018.283

Abstract

The crisis of environment degradation is one of factors that have raised the problem of how to make development sustainable while considering limitations. Trying to solve this problem itself, however, raises another problem: out of the two fields of economics and ecology which one should determine the policy-making for sustainable development. At last, thinking about this led me to the question whether sustainability constrains development, and if yes how. The aim of the research reflected in this paper was to find the answers to these problems and questions in the course of explaining the context of their emergence. The method was to analyze, explain, and infer implications of the theories and comparing them: firstly, the concepts or criteria of sustainability in some important expert fields of knowledge were analyzed and explained so that the status of the ecological concept of sustainability in the mainstream sustainable development becomes clear; secondly, I turned to drawing the implications of important theories in ecology –climax theory, ecosystem theory, permissive ecology theory– for sustainability criterion, and comparing them; finally the recent economic theories of sustainability were analyzed and explained and their consequences for sustainability were inferred. Through all these stages I sought to answer the question whether sustainability constrains development, if yes how, and different criteria were compared in this regard. This study made it clear that (1) in the context of sustainable development, two fields of knowledge have been the most decisive fields in determining the criterion of sustainability: ecology and economics; (2) the sustainability that resulted from ecosystem theory constrains development; (3) but permissive ecology theory cannot regard nature as a norm or criterion for development; (4) permissive ecology’s diluted concept of sustainability leaves development primarily unconstrained; (5) in sustainable development sustainability now has become mainly an economic concept; (6) while strong sustainability has considerable capacity for constraining development, weak sustainability is lacking in this regard.

Keywords

References

Adams, J. (1992). Horse and rabbit stew. In A. Coker and C. Richards (eds.), Valuing the Environment: economic approaches to environmental valuation (pp. 65–73). London: Belhaven.

Adams, W.M. (2009). Green development: environment and sustainability in a developing world (3^rd ed.). UK: Routledge.

Åkerman, M. (2003). What does “Natural Capital” do? The role of metaphor in economic understanding of the environment. Environmental Values, 12, 431–48. doi: 10.3197/096327103129341397

Armsworth, P.R., & Roughgarden, J.E. (2001). An invitation to ecological economics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(5), 229–234. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02123-1

Asghari, S.A. (2017). Naqd va Barrasi-ye Bohrān-e Mohit-e Zist dar Irān (ba Ta’kid bar Barnāmehā-ye Towse’e [A review of environmental criss in Iran, with an emphasis on the development plans] (Unpublished research project). Tehran, Iran: Pažuhešgāh-e Olum-e Ensāni va Motāle’āt-e Farhangi/Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.

Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., et. al. (2002). Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature. Science 297(5583), 950–953. doi: 10.1126/science.1073947

Barbier, E., Markandya, A., Pearce. D.W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and cost–benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A 22: 1259–66. doi: 10.1068/a221259

Beckerman, W. (1994). Sustainable development: is it a useful concept?. Environmental Values 3: 191–209. doi: 10.3197/096327194776679700

Botkin, D.B. (1990). Discordant Harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Botkin, D.B. (2012). The Moon in the Nautilus Shell: Discordant Harmonies Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, L. R. (1981). Building A Sustainable Society. New York: V.V. Norton.

Buckley, G.P. (ed.) (1989). Biological Habitat Reconstruction. London: Belhaven.

Buckley, P. (1995). Critical natural capital: operational flaws in a valid concept. Ecos: A Review of Conservation, 16(3/4), 13–18.

Cairns, J. (1991). The status of the theoretical and applied science of restoration ecology. Environmental Professional, 13, 186–94.

Carlowitz, H. C. V. (1713). Sylvicultura Oeconomica. Leipzig: Johann Friedrich Braun.

Cleveland, J., Stern, D. I., & Costanza, R. (eds.) (2001). The Economics of Nature and the Nature of Economics. London: Edward Elgar.

Common, M., & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological Economics: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Costanza, R. (1989). What is ecological economics?. Ecological Economics, 1, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(89)90020-7

Costanza, R. Ralph d'Arge, Rudolf de Groot, et. al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–60. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

Costanza, R., d’Arge R., Groot R. de, et al. (1998). The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective. Ecological Economics, 25, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00019-6

Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Systems. Washington & Covelo: Island Press.

Daly, H. (1977). Steady-State Economics: the economics of biophysical equilibrium and moral growth. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Daly, H. (1994). Operationalising sustainable development by investing in natural capital. In A. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke and R. Costanza (eds.) Investing in Natural Capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability (pp. 22–37). Washington: Island Press.

Holland, A. & Roxbee Cox, J. (1992). The valuing of environmental goods: a modest proposal. In A. Coker and C. Richards (eds.), Valuing the Environment: economic approaches to environmental valuation (pp. 12–24). London: Belhaven.

Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

Lélé, S. (1991). Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development, 19, 607–21. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P

Lipton, M. (1991). A Note on Poverty and Sustainability. IDS Bulletin, 22(4), 12–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1991.mp22004003.x

May, R. (1977). Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269, 471–7. doi: 10.1038/269471a0

McEvoy, A. (1986). The Fisherman's Problem: ecology and law in California fisheries, 1850-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: synthesis. Washington: Island Press.

O’Connor, M. & Spash, C. (eds.) (1999). Valuation and the Environment: theory, method and practice. London: Edward Elgar.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006). Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment: recent developments. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Pearce, D. Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.

Rostow, W. W. (1960). "The Five Stages of Growth-A Summary". The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scoones, I. (2007). Sustainability. Development in Practice, 17 (4–5), 589-96. doi: 10.1080/09614520701469609

Spash, C. (1999). The development of environmental thinking in economics. Environmental Values, 8, 413–35. doi: 10.3197/096327199129341897

Turner, R. et al. (1992). Valuing the benefits of coastal defence: a case study of the Aldeburgh sea-defence scheme. In A. Coker and C. Richards (eds.), Valuing the Environment: economic approaches to environmental valuation (pp. 77–100). London: Belhaven.

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford & New York : Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

Worster, D. (1977). Nature’s economy: the roots of ecology. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

Worster, D. (1990). The Ecology of Order and Chaos. Environmental History Review, 14, Spring/Summer 1990, pp. 1-18. doi: 10.2307/3984623

Worster, D. (1993). The Shaky Ground of Sustainability. In Wolfgang Sachs (ed.), Global Ecology (pp. 132-145). London: Zed Books.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

CAPTCHA Image

Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Volume 10, Issue 3 - Serial Number 39
June 2018
Pages 33-56

Files

History

Receive Date: 02 November 2017
Revise Date: 15 January 2018
Accept Date: 07 March 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics

Article View: 417
PDF Download: 445