Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ Ph.D. Student of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

² Professor of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³ Associate Professor, Educational Administration and Human Resource Development, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi of University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2021.374

Abstract

The debate over theory and theorizing in educational administration has been an old and persistent challenge. Although many experts view the educational administration field as interdisciplinary and integrated, the epistemological foundations and detection of its interdisciplinary nature and classification in education administration that lead to a validation theory in this field has been rarely studied. Considering the single-discipline and interdisciplinary macro approaches in the production of science, an attempt of theorizing actually focuses on the interdisciplinary approach in terms of diversity of integrated types and their diversified performances. Using an analytical-inferential approach, the present study identifies the current condition of "theorizing" in educational administration after identifying and introducing the interdisciplinary evaluation criteria in three forms of multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary. And through analyzing a typical theory entitled "school as a social system" in educational administration, its natural and inevitable processes in the future have been investigated. The findings indicate that theorizing in educational administration studies is on the verge of transition from a single-discipline approach to multidisciplinary types. This way, the evolution of theorizing is predictable by diverging from a multidisciplinary to an interdisciplinary type.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Educational Management

References

Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57(4), 379–412. doi:10.1177/0018726704043893

Association for Integrative Studies (2000), Accreditation Criteria for Interdisciplinary Studies in General Education. Reterived from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478328.pdf

Augsburg, T. (2005). Becoming interdisciplinary: An introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Kendall, Hunt Publishing Company.

Bates, R. J. (1980). Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 1–20. doi:10.1177/0013161x8001600204

Bates, R. J. (1982). Towards a critical practice of educational administration.‏ Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March 19-23, New York.

Bazargan, A. (2009). The evaluation in interdisciplinary curriculam. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 55-66. doi: 10.7508/isih.2009.03.003

Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701

Bogotch, I. (2021). Afterword: inserting social justice into professional development. Professional Development in Education, 47(1), 191-196.‏ doi: 10.1080/19415257.2020.1848490

Böhme, G. (2017). Midwifery as science: An essay on the relation between scientific and everyday knowledge. Society & Knowledge, 373–392. doi:10.4324/9781315129884-17

Boon, M., & Van Baalen, S. (2018). Epistemology for interdisciplinary research – shifting philosophical paradigms of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1). doi:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4

Boyan, N. J. (1981). Follow the leader: Commentary on research in educational administration. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 6-21.‏ doi: 10.3102/0013189X010002006

Bush, T. (2006). Educational Leadership and Management: South African and Global Perspectives. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 443–448. doi:10.1177/1741143206068210

Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: a literature review. report, Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, University of Southampton.‏

Collins, J. P. (2002). May You Live in Interesting Times: Using Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Programs to Cope with Change in the Life Sciences: Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research and training programs provide life science departments a way to foster the innovation needed to cope with rapid change in biology. BioScience, 52(1), 75-83.‏

Davidson, M. (2004). Bones of contention: using self and story in the quest to professionalize higher education teaching—an interdisciplinary approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 299-310.‏

Davies, M., & Devlin, M. T. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education: Implications for teaching and learning. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.‏

Davies, P.; & Dunnill, R. (2006). Disciplines, outcomes and purpose in social science education. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 62-71.

Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 North Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-1453 (Stock No. 611-93025; $8.95).

Drake, S. M.; & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. USA, Virginia: ASCD.‏

Eacott, S. (2017). A social epistemology for educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3), 196-214. doi:10.1080/00220620.2017.1315380

Glass, T. E., Mason, R., Carver, F. D., Eaton, W., & Parker, J. C. (2004). The history of educational administration viewed through its textbooks. USA: R&L Education.‏

Gunter, H. M. (2005). Conceptualizing research in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 165-180.‏ doi:10.1177/1741143205051051

Gunter, H. M. (2016). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. Bloomsbury Publishing.‏

Hailer, E. J. (1968). The interdisciplinary ideology in educational administration: Some preliminary notes on the sociology of knowledge. Educational administration quarterly, 4(2), 61-77.‏ doi: 10.1177/0013131X6800400206

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369.‏ doi: 10.3102/0034654319830380

Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2014). Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 6-29.‏ doi: 10.1177/1741143213502196

Hare, D. B. (1996). Theory development in educational administration from 1947 to 1995. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, UMI Microform, 9624189.‏

Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1), 155-176.‏

Hongcai, W. A. N. G. (2007). Education: a discipline or a field? Frontiers of Education in China, 2(1), 63-73.‏

Hosseingholizadeh, R., Ahanchian, M. R., Noferesti, A., & Kouhsari, M. (2017). A History of Educational Management Thought with Regards to International Experiences. Foundations of Education, 6(2), 128-152.‏ doi: 10.22067/fedu.v6i2.60913

Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research policy, 39(1), 79-88.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Katbi, M. (2000). Our social sciences and interdisciplinary research. Soxan-e Samt, 6(-), 20-16.

Khalkhali, A. (2013). Generalized educational management (GEM), the route out of the crisis of discipline identity. Unpublished lecture) Iranian Educational Management Association, Tehran, Iran.

Khalkhali, A. (2015). Generalized Educational Management (Readout & Reconstruction of Discipline Role (. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University, Printing and Publishing Organization; Tonekabon.

Khorsandi Taskooh, A. (2008). Interdisciplinary discourse of knowledge: theoretical foundations, typology, and policies for practice in higher education. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.

Khorsandi Taskooh, A. (2009). Interdisciplinarity and its challenges in higher education. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(2), 85-101.‏ 10.7508/isih.2009.02.005

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.‏

Klein, J. T. (2004). curriculum model: inter/trans/multi/pluri-disciplinary. In: A. Distefano, K.E. Rudestam & R. J. Silverman (Eds). Encyclopedia of Distributed Learning (Pp. 84). Chicago: Reference & User Services.

Lenhard, J., Lücking, H., & Schwechheimer, H. (2006). Expert knowledge, Mode-2 and scientific disciplines: two contrasting views. Science and Public Policy, 33(5), 341-350.‏ doi: 10.3152/147154306781778876

Lindsay, B., Kofie, S., & Mbepera, J. G. (2017). Administrative matters for African educational leaders: Illustrations from women secondary school administrators in Tanzania and Ghana. The Wiley International Handbook of Educational Leadership (Pp. 271). Wiley.‏

Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological economics, 53(1), 5-16.‏ doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014

McGregor, S. L. (2015). The Nicolescuian and Zurich approaches to transdisciplinarity. Integral Leadership Review, 15(2), 1-18.‏

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2009). Key considration on the policy making for interdisciplinary sciences in higher education from the standpoint of development process. Interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, 1(3), 1-18. doi:10.7508/isih.2009.03.001

Mehrmohammadi, M.; & Kizuri, A. H. (2011). Evaluation quality indicators of academic interdisciplinary sciences: A tool for planning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2(2), 89-112. doi: 10.7508/ISIH.2010.06.005

Meisami, H., Abdolahy, M., Shahidi Nasab, M., Ghaemiasl, M. (2011). Interdisciplinary approaches and designing Islamic economics and finance curriculum. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2(3), 31-58. doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.002

Moran, E. (2008). Around interdisciplinarity. Translated by Tohideh Malabashi, in Seyed Mohsen Alavipour et al. (Edited and translated), theoretical foundations and methodology of interdisciplinary studies. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.

Motamedi, A. Z. A. M., Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi, M., Khorsandi Taskoh, A., & Arefi, M. (2018). The Evolution of the typology of interdisciplinary research: A historical-genealogical study. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 11(1), 1-32.‏ doi: 10.22035/isih.2019.2929.3266

Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Handbook of research on educational administration. A project of the American Educational Research Association. Jossey-Bass, Inc.‏

Murre, P. (2018). An Intellectual History of School Leadership Practice and Research. International Journal of Christianity & Education, 22(1), 81-82.‏ doi: 10.1177/2056997117743945

Newell, W. H., & Gagnon, P. (2013). The state of the field: Interdisciplinary theory. Issues In interdisciplinary studies, 31, 22-43‏.

Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity–Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. The ATLAS Transdisciplinary-Transnational-Transcultural Bi-Annual Meeting.‏

Oplatka, I. (2008). The field of educational management: Some intellectual insights from the 2007 BELMAS national conference. Management in Education, 22(3), 4-10.‏ doi: 10.1177/0892020608093256

Oplatka, I., & Khalid, A. R. A. R. (2016). The field of educational administration as an arena of knowledge production: Some implications for Turkish field members. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 1(2), 161-186.‏

Örücü, D. (2006). An analysis of the present state of educational administration scholarship in Turkey from the perceptions of the scholars in Ankara (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University. Çankaya. Ankara

Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2019). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. New York: Sage.‏

Ribbins, P. (1993). Greenfield on Educational Administration: Towards a Humane Science. London: Routledge.‏

Roland, S. (2008). Theoretical foundations and methodology of interdisciplinary studies. (M. Alavipour et al, Translation and compilation). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.

Sadeghii Fasaei, S., & Erfanmanesh, I. (2015). Methodological principles of documentary research in social sciences; Case of study: Impacts of modernization on Iranian family.‏ Strategy for Culture, 8(29), 61-91.

Shabani, Z. (2010). Designing and presenting a comprehensive approach to the integration of curricula in the field of humanities, Proceedings of the Congress Strategies for the Promotion of the Humanities in the country, (Pp 388-375), Tehran, Iran.

Shirazi, A. (2017). Educational administration: theory, research and practice (2^nd ed.). Tehran, Iran: Mehrbān.

Stember, M. (1998). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature, 337-352.‏

Tipton, B. (1977). The Tense Relationship of Sociology and Educational Administration. Educational Administration, 5(2), 46-57.‏ doi: 10.1177/174114327700500210

Van Baalen, P., & Karsten, L. (2012). The evolution of management as an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 219-237. doi: 10.1108/17511341211206861

Wang, Y., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Mapping the field of educational administration research: A journal citation network analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 242-269. doi: 10.1108/JEA-02-2015-0013

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

CAPTCHA Image

Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Volume 13, Issue 4 - Serial Number 52
July 2021
Pages 1-30

Files

History

Receive Date: 03 February 2021
Revise Date: 12 May 2021
Accept Date: 05 June 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics

Article View: 876
PDF Download: 993