<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Institute for Social &amp; Cultural Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-4641</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic  Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic  Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>161</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>190</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">68</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.7508/isih.2010.07.007</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shabani</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Imam Sadiq, Tehan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study indicates that essential perceptions and scholarly conceptions in social sciences are remarkably distinguished from each other. They are individualism, holism, collectivism, and systemism. It further deals with the point that socio-economic factors and institutions have a causative interrelation. An independent and isolated study of these institutions can never give a true and proper understanding of these issues. This goal is not achievable but through synthetic and interdisciplinary conceptions including holistic, and systemic methods.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study indicates that essential perceptions and scholarly conceptions in social sciences are remarkably distinguished from each other. They are individualism, holism, collectivism, and systemism. It further deals with the point that socio-economic factors and institutions have a causative interrelation. An independent and isolated study of these institutions can never give a true and proper understanding of these issues. This goal is not achievable but through synthetic and interdisciplinary conceptions including holistic, and systemic methods.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">individualism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">holism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">systemism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interdisciplinary</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">humanities</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">methodology</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.isih.ir/article_68_a3f390d88e4c41f2747bfa2f1b5f87db.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
