COVID-19 Crisis
M. Fouladiyan; F. Sadrnabavi; P. Khosronejad; M. Vaez Mousavi; M. Zarifpooya; V. Shameli; Z. Baghban Golkhatmi; M. Shamsaei
Abstract
Social phenomena are so complex that one cannot gain an understanding of all their aspects by a specific approach or a single discipline. Turning to pilgrimage action when there is the possibility of catching a dangerous disease before, during, and after the pilgrimage, the study of such phenomena requires ...
Read More
Social phenomena are so complex that one cannot gain an understanding of all their aspects by a specific approach or a single discipline. Turning to pilgrimage action when there is the possibility of catching a dangerous disease before, during, and after the pilgrimage, the study of such phenomena requires taking a deep interdisciplinary and qualitative approach. With the prevalence of Coronavirus in Iran as a Muslim country, there are controversies over the conflict of observing hygienic rules or performing religious rites, especially regarding the presence of the Imams in the shrines. To investigate the effect of coronavirus outbreak on the rites of pilgrimage to the Imam Reza shrine via a qualitative approach and content analysis method. Accordingly, 46 pilgrims to the Imam Reza shrine were interviewed to investigate the reasons for their presence in these special circumstances and examine their pilgrimage methods to the Razavi shrine. The findings show that four categories of pilgrimage justification styles were obtained in the mental dimension, which include traditional-devotional, mitigation-denial, compulsion-imitation, and rational styles. These four styles are distinguished from each other based on the degree of attention paid to the earthly matter (i.e., the disease and its seriousness).
Sociology
M. Fouladiyan; H. R. Jalaeipour
Abstract
There are different and at times contradictory concepts of Charismatic and Farrahmandaneh authority. Some researchers and translators have used these concepts interchangeably. There are, however, fundamental differences between these two. Based on the three types of authority in Weber`s view, ...
Read More
There are different and at times contradictory concepts of Charismatic and Farrahmandaneh authority. Some researchers and translators have used these concepts interchangeably. There are, however, fundamental differences between these two. Based on the three types of authority in Weber`s view, in this article I have tried to clarify the meanings and boundaries of them. To do this, basic dimensions of the three Weberian types of authority are discussed along with Farrahmandaneh authority in order to clarify the status of Farrahmandaneh authority in Weber`s intellectual system. Since the concept of authority and different forms of it are understood and interpreted in different epistemic systems, to achieve a comprehensive understanding of it and in particular, to compare the types of Weberian authority with Farrahmandaneh authority, one has to rely on sociology, political science, and even history and literature. As far as the limits and scope of this article allow, the interdisciplinary nature of this concept has been in the forefront. The results show that despite some similarities, Farrahmandaneh authority has major differences with Charismatic authority. In fact, Farrahmandaneh authority is a kind of traditional authority which due to structural factors contains some dimensions of Charismatic authority as well.
