Criticism of individualist and collectivist methodological approaches to social emergence

Amiri Tehrani, M.R.

doi:10.22035/isih.2023.5009.4843

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

M.R. Amiri Tehrani

Assistant Professor in Philosophy of Science and Technology, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Economy, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2023.5009.4843

Abstract

The individual-community relationship has always been one of the most fundamental topics of social sciences. In sociology, this is known as the micro-macro relationship while in economics it refers to the processes, through which, individual actions lead to macroeconomic phenomena. Based on philosophical discourse and systems theory, many sociologists even use the term "emergence" in their understanding of micro-macro relationship, which refers to collective phenomena that are created by the cooperation of individuals, but cannot be reduced to individual actions. "Emergence" theories attempt to explain the nature of society as a complex system by examining how individuals and their relationships lead to the creation of integrated and macro-social phenomena such as markets, educational systems, cultural beliefs, and shared social practices. As a prelude to activity, every researcher has to answer the question from the methodological point of view, how is it possible to study the behavior of social groups and how can we gain knowledge about the laws related to social groups? Anyone who deals with humanities and social sciences or any reality and phenomenon that affects human beings, inevitably deals with the reality that is emerging. In fact, emergence occurs when one level of reality emerges radically from another level. Examples of emergent levels of reality include how the mind emerges from the body; or the way society emerges from human beings. Therefore, when there is an emerging factor, different scientific disciplines should be used, because it is inevitable to talk about social affairs, psychology and neurobiology, as well as physical and even chemical.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Philosophy

References

Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., & Kim, J. (eds.) (1992). Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of Naturalism. New York: Routledge.

Bhaskar, R., Danermark, B. & Price, L. (2018). Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: A critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. London and New York: Routledge.

Blau, P.M. (1981). Introduction: diverse views of social structure and their common denominator. In Blau, P.M. & Merton, R.K. (eds.), Continuity in Structural Inquiry (pp. 1–23). Beverly Hills: Sage.

Blau, P.M. (1987). Microprocess and macrostructure. In K.S. Cook (ed.), Social Exchange Theory (pp. 83–100). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Brooks, R.A., & Maes, P. (eds). (1994). Artificial life IV; proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Coleman, J. S. (1987). Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In: J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & Neil J. Smelser (Eds.). The Micro-Macro Link (pp. 153–73). Berkeley: University of California.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Elster, J. (1985). Making sense of Marx. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fodor, J.A. (1974). Special sciences (Or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28(2), 97–115.

Fodor, J.A. (1989). Making mind matter more. Philosophical Topics, 17, 59-79.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.

Horgan, T. (1993). From supervenience to superdupervenience: meeting the demands of a material world. Mind, 102, 555-586.

Humphreys, P. (1997). How properties emerge”. Philosophy of Science, 64, 1-17.

Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.

Kincaid, H. (1997). Individualism and the unity of science. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Lewis, D.K. (1986). The plurality of worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nigel, G., & Conte, R. (eds.) (1995). Artificial societies; The computer simulation of social life. London: UCL Press.