Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

The interdisciplinary concept of strategic foresight in the trans-disciplinary of futures studies: what is it and why does it matter?

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Shirvani 1
M.R. Eivazi 2
H. Ghasemi 3

1 PhD Student in Futures Studies, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Professor in Political Sociology, Department of Futures Study, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

3 Associate Professor in Political Sciences, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22631/isih.2017.258
Abstract
The emergence of the trans-disciplinary of futures studies after World War II put aside prophet-like fortune-telling and predictions. This trans-disciplinary, having undergone ups and downs during the recent decades, always tried to provide some scientific propositions about the future. Among these, different approaches and concepts were proposed in the field of futures studies, and each despite commonalities has specific futures and distinctions. One of these most important concepts is the concept of strategic foresight. This paper aims at exploring the quiddity of this concept. First, the significance and position of the strategic foresight in futures studies was defined and delineated, and then the interdisciplinary identity of this concept and its epistemological basis were analyzed. The findings indicated that strategic foresight as an interdisciplinary is progressing, and unlike some other, approaches of futures studies were not associated with failure and decline. This interdisciplinary benefits from some kind of inter-paradigm rationality, and consistent with its features it can be highly efficient in different contexts of long-term planning of the country, especially in economy. Finally, some suggestions were made to pay more attention to and apply strategic foresight in the country.

Keywords

strategy
epistemology
universal rationality
inter-paradigm rationality
experimental rationality
value-based rationality
Pragmatism
Subjects
بهرامی، آرش؛ یادگارزاده، غلامرضا؛ و پرند، کورش (1388). روش‌شناسی پویایی سیستم در نظام آموزش عالی. تدبیر، 203، 58-53.
تریگ، راجر (1394). فهم علم اجتماعی (مترجم: شهناز مسمی‌پرست). تهران: نشر گل آذین.
چالمرز، آلن (1393). چیستی علم (چاپ چهاردهم؛ مترجم: سعید زیباکلام). تهران: سمت.
خزایی، سعید؛ و الهی دهقی، ایرج (1391). عوامل موفقیت در آینده‌نگاری ملی. فصلنامه مطالعات آینده‌پژوهی، 2، 28-5.
خلیل، طارق (1388). مدیریت تکنولوژی (چاپ سوم؛ مترجم: سیدمحمد اعرابی و داود ایزدی). تهران: دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.
غفاریان، وفا؛ و کیانی، غلامرضا (1380). استراتژی اثربخش. تهران: نشر فرا.
ناظمی، امیر؛ و قدیری، روح‌‌الله (1385). آینده‌نگاری از مفهوم تا اجرا. تهران: مرکز صنایع نوین.
Appiah, G., & Sarpong, D. (2015). On the influence of organizational routines on strategic foresight. Foresight, 17(5), 512–527. doi: 10.1108/FS-11-2014-0067
Ackoff, R. (1981). Creating the corporate future: Plan or be planned. New York: John Wiley.
Amanatidou, E. (2011). Grand challenges–a new framework for foresight evaluation. EU-SPRI Conference, Manchester.
Bell, W. (2005). Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era. New Brunswichk, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bourgeois, P. (2001). Technology foresight for strategic decision making. Regional conference on technology foresight for central and eastern Europe and the newly independent states, Vienna, Austria.
Calof, J., Tanguay, D., & Spring, L. (2006). Addressing Canada’s foresight capacity: A report to the national science advisor. Science and Technology Foresight Directorate, Office of the National Science Advisor, Government of Canada, Ottawa.
Dufva, M., Konnola, T., & Koivisto, R. (2015). Multi-layered foresight: Lessons from regional foresight in Chile. Futures, 73, 100-111. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.010
FOREN (2001). A practical guide to regional foresight. Seville, Spain: IPTS.
Gaspar, T. S. (2015). Strategia Sapiens–strategic foresight in a new perspective. Foresight, 17(5), 405-426. doi: 10.1108/FS-03-2015-0017
Glenn, J. C., Gordon, T. J., & Dator, J. (2001). Closing the deal: How to make organizations act on futures research. Foresight, 3(3), 177-189. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803111
Godet, M. (1994). From anticipation to action. Paris: UNESCO publication.
Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight for corporate and regional development. Paris: UNESCO publication.
Hideg, E. (2002). Implications of Two new paradigms for futures studies. Futures, 34(3), 283-294. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00044-1
Hines, A., & Bishop, P. (2007). Thinking about the future: Guidelines for the strategic foresight. Washington: Social Technologies LLC.
Ingvar, D. H. (1985). Memory of the future: An essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Hum Neurobiol, 4(3), 127-136.
Kapoor, R. (2001). Future as fantasy: Forgetting the flaws. Futures, 33(2), 161-170. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00061-6
Keenan, M. (2003). Technology foresight: An introduction. Technology foresight for organizers, Ankara, Turkey.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: university of Chicago press.
Kuosa, T. (2011). Evolution of futures studies. Futures, 43, 327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.001
Kuosa, T. (2012). The evolution of strategic foresight: Navigating public policy making. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Miles, I., & Keenan, M. (2003). Overview of methods used in foresight. Technology foresight for organizers, Ankara, Turkey. 8-12 December.
Mullin, J., Adam, R. M., Halliwell, J. E., & Milligan, L. P. (2000). Science, technology, and innovation. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
Paya, A., & Baradaran Shoraka, H. (2010). Futures studies in Iran: Learning through trial and error. Futures, 42(5), 484-495. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.033
Podesta, G. P., Natenzon, C. E., Hidalgo, C., & Toranzo, F. R. (2013). Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: A case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environmental Science & Policy, 26, 40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.008
Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures & refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected?. Foresight, 10(6), 62-89. doi: 10.1108/14636680810918586
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Techniques for analyzing industrial and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Pourezzat, A. (2008). Building the future: Undertaking proactive strategy for national outlook. Futures, 40(10), 887-892.doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.024
Rejeski, D., & Olson, R. L. (2006). Has futurism failed?. The Wilson Quarterly, Wilson Institute, Washington D.C; Winter, 14-21.
Riedy, C. (2009). The influence of futures work on public policy and sustainability. Foresight, 11(5), 40-56. doi: 10.1108/14636680910994950
Robbins, L. (1984). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan Company.
Sardar, Z. (2010). The namesake: Futures; Futures studies; Futurology; Futuristic; Foresight What’s in a name?. Futures, 42(3), 177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001
Saritas, O., Taymaz, E., & Tumer, T. (2006). Vision 2023: Turkey’s national technology foresight program: A contextualist description and analysis. Economic Research Center Middle East Technical University.
Shimizu, K. (2011). The cores of strategic management. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Silva, M. (2015). A systematic review of foresight in project Management literature. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.630
Slaughter, R. (1995). The foresight principle: Cultural recovery in the 21st century. London: Adamantine Press.
Slaughter, R. (2002). Futures studies as a civilizational catalyst. Futures, 34, 349-363. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00049-0
Smits, R., Zweck, A., Rader, M., Barre, R., & Salo, A. (2001). Strategic policy intelligence: Current trends, the state of play and perspectives. Seville, Spain: IPTS.
Stein, Z. (2007). Modeling the demands of interdisciplinarity: Toward a framework for evaluating interdisciplinary endeavors. Integral Review, 4, 92-107. doi: 10.1.1.538.9065&rep
Stevenson, T. (2001). The futures of futures studies. Futures, 33(7), 665-669. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00009-X
UNIDO. (2005). Technology foresight manual (vol. 1). Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Vishnevskiy, K., Meissner, D., & Karasev, O. (2015). Strategic foresight: State of the art and prospects for Russian corporations. Foresight, 17(5), 460-474. doi: 10.1108/FS-11-2014-0075
Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10-21. doi: 10.1108/14636680310698379
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 14 November 2016
  • Revise Date 18 April 2017
  • Accept Date 26 December 2016

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us