Cultivating an interdisciplinary view in undergraduate general education curriculum: A comparative study of Iran, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

10.22035/isih.2026.5554.5168
Abstract
Despite the acknowledged importance of the undergraduate general curriculum in cultivating interdisciplinary perspectives among students, the underlying rationale behind such curricula in Iran remains unclear. This comparative study explores and evaluates the undergraduate general education curriculum within Iran’s higher education system alongside that of four international institutions: Mount Royal University ((MRU), the University of New South Wales (UNSW), the Polytechnic University (PolyU), and the National University of Singapore (NUS). This study employed a qualitative approach and the data systematically gathered and analyzed by Bereday's four stages method. The findings reveal that, in contrast to the Iranian undergraduate general education curriculum, where students do not have much freedom in choosing subject clusters or course units, the selected universities employ flexible and decentralized curricular structures. Their intended learning outcomes and course offerings encompass a broader and more diverse array of subjects—including personal and organizational development, local, national, and global identities, the natural and mathematical sciences, as well as the arts—all framed within an interdisciplinary orientation. These international curricula are more responsive to both the societal and individual needs of students. In conclusion, the study recommends a comprehensive review and needs assessment of Iran’s undergraduate general curriculum, emphasizing the integration of interdisciplinary approaches to enhance educational quality and ensure alignment with evolving societal demands and stakeholder expectations.

Keywords

Subjects

Arefi, M., Ghahremani, M., Rezaeizadeh, M. (2009). The necessity and strategies for improving the curriculum of general undergraduate courses from the perspective of students and faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University. Quarterly Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3 (10), 129-94. [In persian]
Arthur, J. (2005). The re-emergence of character education in British educational policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(3), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00293.x
Azizi, Y., Sadeghi, A. R., & Abdollahi, H. (2016). Examining the Quality of Public Courses in the Undergraduate Curriculum from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members and Students. Qualitative Research in Curriculum1(2), 1-24. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/10.22054/qric.2016.7038
Babaee, M., & Zare Ramashti, A. (2024). Challenges and solutions of general courses of Farhangian University with emphasis on textbooks from the students' point of view. University Textbooks; Research and Writting, 27(53), 174-204. doi:10.30487/rwab.2024.2009989.1577
Berg-Schlosser, D. (2001). Comparative Studies: Method and Design. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (1st ed., pp. 2427-2433). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chang, T. S., Wang, H. C., Haynes, A. M., Song, M. M., Lai, S. Y., & Hsieh, S. H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. Thinking Skills and Creativity46, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173
Cohen, A. M. (1998). The shaping of American higher education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dehghani, A. A., Nasr Isfahani, A. R., & Meshkat, A. R. (2023). Investigating the rationale of offering Islamic thought courses at the undergraduate of universities. Research in Islamic Education Issues31(59), 91-118. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22516972.1402.31.59.6.8
Gaff, J. (1983). General Education Today: A Critical Analysis of Controversies, Practices, and Reforms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ghasempour, E., Hakimzadeh, R., Malekipour, A., Ghasempour, E. (2016). Comparative Study of General Courses at the University of Missouri, U. C. Davis, Beirut and Tehran. Qualitative Research in Curriculum1(2), 25-45. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/10.22054/qric.2016.7037
Henschel, S., Lewis, M., Wade, K. C., & Schwertner, D. (2018). Trends in undergraduate general education in the US, the Texas Core Curriculum, and communication course requirements. Texas Education Review, 6(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.15781/T23J39J30
Khaleghinezhad, S. A. (2021). The History of Undergraduate General Education Curriculum in Iran: A Documentary Study. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies12(23), 239-267.
Maki, P. (2015). Assessment that works: A national call, a twenty-first-century response. Association of American Colleges & Universities. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront. net/content/user- photos/Publications/Excerpts-and-TOC/VALASSESS_Intro.pdf.
Mount Royal University (2019) General education. Reterived from: https://catalog.mtroyal.ca/content.php?catoid=17&navoid=1012
National University of Singapore (2019) Curriculum Structure and Graduation, Retrived from: https://www.science.nus.edu.sg/undergraduates/general-academic-requirements-and-policies/
O’Banion, T. (2016).A brief history of general education, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40:4, 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1117996
Pan, J. D., & Pan, H. M. (2005). Accomplishments of the holistic education idea: An Example from Chung Yuan Christian University. Chung Yuan Journal, 33(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073718
Petrina, S. (2022). Methods of Analysis: Curriculum analysis. The University of British Columbia. Research 2.0 (blog). https://blogs.ubc.ca/researchmethods/methodologies/analysis/
Schanker, J. B. (2011). CAO perspective: The role of general education objectives in career and technical programs in the United States and Europe (Doctoral dissertation). National Louis University.ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Shankman. C. K. (2012). General Education at Catholic Colleges and Universities. Center for the Advancement of Catholic Higher Education. Retrived from: https://cardinalnewmansociety.org/general-education-at-catholic-colleges-and-universities/
The Hong Kong Polytechniquic University (2020). Office of general requirement university. Retrived from: https://www.polyu.edu.hk/ogur/GURSubjects/
University of New South Wales (2020) General Education Program. Retrieved from: http://legacy.handbook.nsw.edu.au
Wells, C. A. (2016). A Distinctive Vision for the Liberal Arts: General Education and the Flourishing of Christian Higher Education. Christian Higher Education, 15(1–2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2016.1117277
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Wilcke, H., & Budke, A. (2019). Comparison as a method for geography education. Education sciences9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030225
Xing, J. (Ed.). (2013). General education and the development of global citizenship in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China: not merely icing on the cake. Routledge.
Xue, C., Yang, T., & Umair, M. (2023). Approaches and Reforms in Undergraduate Education for Integration of Major and General Education: A Comparative Study among Teaching, Teaching—Research, and Research Universities in China. Sustainability, 15(2), 1251. doi:10.3390/su15021251
Yan, K., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The tensions of general education reform in China. Asia Pacific Education Review25(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09767-4
Ye, H., Xu, S., Wen, J. (2026). Design and Implementation of a General Education Curriculum for EEE Undergraduate Programs from the Perspective of UK IET Accreditation. In: Ventura, M.D., Zhan, Z. (eds) Exploring Innovations in Educational Technology: The ICEIT’25 Collection. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62365-4_40
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 23 September 2026

  • Receive Date 01 August 2025
  • Revise Date 29 January 2026
  • Accept Date 13 February 2026