Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Conceptual Typology of Justice in Urban Planning Theories based on an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

H. Dadashpoor 1
N. Alvandipour 2

1 Associate Professor, Urban and Regional Planning Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Urban and Regional Planning Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22631/isih.2017.248
Abstract
Spatial justice is the ultimate goal for human society and one of the main purposes of urban planning. In its most general sense, it has been accepted with significant popularity among the experts and scholars throughout history. The result is a massive collection of various theories based on the concept of justice in the city. However, due to the interdisciplinary nature of justice, sometimes the implementations of this concept as well as its definitions and explanations do not agree or even they may contradict.Therefore, defining a conceptual typology and clarifying the theoretical route of justice urban theories are the main aims of this paper. To do this, we use systematic review of justice based theories in urban planning and utilize Allmendinger mete-theory framework with five broad categories. Besides defining the framework, it also provides opportunity for theorizing in this field. The present article attempts to explain the essence of justice urban planning theories. In this regard, methods such as Systematic Review, secondary study and typology as quality research strategies are used to collect and analyze the data. Typology study helps the better understanding of this interdisciplinary concept. Therefore, by reviewing all typology of planning theory, justice urban planning theories have been explained, based on the selected one. At the end, this article presents a conceptual frameworkfor better and more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of the principle of justice in urban planning.

Highlights

  • This article presents a conceptual framework for understanding of justice in urban planning
  • The present article attempts to explain the essence of just urban planning theories.
  • Clarifying the theoretical route of just urban theories is the main aims of this paper.
  • ‌Methods such as systematic review and typology as quality research strategies are used to collect and analyze the data.
  • Besides defining the framework, it also provides opportunity for theorizing in this field based on Iranian-Islamic values.

Keywords

Justice
Urban Planning
Indigenous Planning Theory
Metatheories Typology
Subjects
Abdi Daneshpour, Z. (2008). Darāmadi bar nazariyehā-ye barnāmerizi: Bā ta'kid-e viže bar barnāmerizi-ye šahri [An introduction to planning theories with special reference to urban planning theories]. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
Afroogh, E. (1997). Fazā va nābarābari-ye ejtemā'i: Motāle'e-ye jodāyigozini-ye fazāyi va tamarkoz-e faqr dar mahallehā-ye maskuni-ye Tehran [Space and social inequality: Spatial segregation and poverty concentration in Tehran residential neighborhoods]. Tehran, Iran: Department of Humanities, University of Tarbiat Modares.
Allmendinger, P. (2002a). Planning theory. Hounds Mills: Palgrave.
Allmendinger, P. (2002b). Towards a post-positivist typology. Planning Theory, 1(1), 77-99.  doi: 10.1177/147309520200100105
Asghari, F. (2015). Molāhezāt-e raveššenāxti dar motāle'āt-e howze-ye jensiyat [Methodological considerations in gender studies]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 7(4), 105-127. doi: 10.7508/isih.2015.28.004
Bailey, K. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. London: Sage Publication.
Bazargan Harandi, A. (2015). Moqaddamei bar ravešhā-ye tahqiq-e keyfi va āmixte: Ruykardhā-ye motadāvel dar olum-e raftāri [An introduction to the qualitative and mixed methods research]. Tehran, Iran: Didār.
Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory, 1(2), 163-187.  doi: 10.1177/147309520200100205
Craig, R., & Muller, H. (2007). Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions. Sage Publications.
Dadashpoor, H., & Alvandipour, N. (2016). edālat-e fazāyi dar  meqyas-e šahri dar Iran[Urban Spatial Justice in Iran]. Journal Honarha-ye ziba/Fine Arts Journal, 21(3), 67-80.
Dadashpoor, H., Alizadeh, B., & Rostami, F. (2015a). Goftemān-e edālat-e Fazāyi dar Šahr [Spatial justice dialogue in city]. Tehran, Iran: Āzaraxš.
Dadashpoor, H., Alizadeh, B., & Rostami, F. (2015b). Jāygāh-e edālat-e fazāyi dar nezām-e barnāmerizi-ye šahri-ye Iran [The status of spatial equity in the urban planning system in Iran]. Journal of Development Strategy, 43, 181-206.
Danaiefard, H. (2013). Nazariyepardāzi: Mabāni va raveššenāsihā [Theory building: Fundamentals and methodologies]. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
Ejlali, P., Rafieian, M., & Asgari, A. (2012). Nazariye-ye barnāmerizi: Didgāhhā-ye sonnati va now [Planning theory: Traditional and new approaches]. Tehran, Iran: Āgah.
Fainstein, S. (2001). The city builders. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fainstein, S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18, 1-18. Doi: 10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Friedmann, J. (2008). Barnāmerizi dar howze-ye omumi: Az šenāxt tā amal [Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action] (A. Aghvami Moghadam, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Markaz-e Motāle'āti va Tahqiqāti-ye Šahrsāzi va Me'māri-ye Irān.
Ghazi Tabatabaei, M., & Vadadhir, A. (2010). Farātahlil dar pažuhešhā-ye ejtemā'i va raftāri [The applications of meta- analysis in social & behavioral researches]. Tehran, Iran: Entešārāt-e Jāme'ešenāsān.
Gillette, H. (1995). Between justice & beauty: Race, planning, and the failure of urban policy in Washington. D.C. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hafezniya, M. (2008). Moqaddamei bar raveš-e tahqiq dar olum-e ensāni [An introduction to research methods in human sciences]. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
Harvey, D. (1997). Edālat-e ejtemā'i va šahr [Social Justice and the City] (F. Hessamian, M. R. Haeri, & B. Monadizadeh, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Šerkat-e Pardāzeš va Barnāmerizi-ye Šahri.
Harvey, D., & Potter, C. (2009). The right to the just city. In J. C. P. Marcuse, Searching for the just city (pp. 40-51), New York, NY: Routledge.
Hataminejad, H. (2011). Osul-e edālat-e ejtemā'i va bāzxāni-ye fazāyi-ye Iran [Principles of social justice and space study of Iranian]. In Dovvomin Nešast-e Andišehā-ye Rāhbordi-ye Edālat/The Second Meeting of Strategic Ideas of Justice. Tehran, Iran: Dabirxāne-ye Howzavi-ye Markaz-e Olgu-ye Eslāmi Irāni-ye Piŝraft.
Hooman, H. A. (2012). Rāhnamā-ye amali-ye farātahlil dar pažuheš-e elmi [Handbook on meta-analysis in scientific research]. Tehran, Iran: Samt.
Iman, M. T. (2009). Mabāni-ye pārādāymi-ye ravešhā-ye tahqiq-e kammi va keyfi dar olum-e ensāni [The paradigm foundations of quantitative and qualitative research methods in the humanities]. Tehran, Iran: Pažuhešgāh-e Howze va Dānešgāh/Research Institute of Hawzah and University.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Mabāni va raveššenāsi-ye tahlil-e mohtavā [Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology](H. Nayebi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Lashkari, A. R. (2009). Haq, edālat va jāme'e [Right, justice and society]. Jastārhā-ye Eqtesādi-ye Iran/Iran's Economic Essays, 6(12), 31-57.
Lynch, K. (2002). Te'ori-ye šekl-e šahr [The image of the city](H. Bahreini, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Mo'assese-ye Entešārāt va Čāp-e Dānešgāh-e Tehran.
Marcuse, P. (2009). Postscript: Beyond the Just City to the Right to the City. In p. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter, & J. Steil, In Searching for the the Just City, New York: Routledge.
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2011). Raveš va nazariye dar olum-e siyāsi [Theory and methods in political science] (6th ed.; A. M. Haji-Yousefi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Pažuheškade-ye Motāle'āt-e Rāhbordi/Institute of Strategic Studies.
Marsousi, N. (2004). Tahlil-e fazāyi-ye edālat-e ejtemā'i dar šahr-e Tehran [Spatial analysis of social justice in Tehran]. Tehran, Iran: Faculty of Humanities, University of Tarbiat Modarres.
Marsousi, N. (2007). Tahlili joghrāfiyāyi az te'orihā-ye edālat-e ejtemā'i [Geographic analysis of social justice theories].  Našriye-ye Olum-e Joghrāfiyāyi/ Geographical Sciences, 7, 107-124.
Mirveysinik, S. (2015). Towse'e-ye ensāni va edālat-e jensiyati dar ruykard-e qābeliyati-ye Amartya Sen [Human development and gender justice in the Amartya Sen’s capability approach]. Faslnāme-ye  Motāle'āt-e Miyānreštei dar Olum-e Ensāni/Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 7(4), 47-72. doi: 10.7508/isih.2015.28.003
Mohammadpour, A. (2013). Raveš-e tahqiq-e keyfi; Zed-e raveš-e 1 [Qualitative research method; Counter method 1]. Tehran, Iran: Jāme'ešenāsān.
Mousakhani, M., Manian, A., Akhgar, B., Javadi Amoli, M., & Nemati ShamsAbadi, H. A. (2013). Modiriyat-e dāneš: Tarh-e mas'ale-ye modiriyat-e dāneš dar tamaddon-e dini [knowledge management Discussing the issue of knowledge management in religious civilization]. Eslām va Modiriyat/Islam and Management, 2(3), 7-42.
Noorian, F., & Saeedi Rezvani, H. (2012). Gunešenāsi-ye ārā-ye bonyādin-e ma'tuf be edālat dar šahr [Typology of fundamental thoughts of justice in the city]. Sāxt-e Šahr/City Development Research Journal, 10(20), 13-24.
Pour Ahmad, A., & Hatami Nejad, H. (2006). Āsibšenāsi-ye tarhhā-ye towse'e-ye šahri dar kešvar [Pathology urban development plans in the Iran]. Pažuhešha-ye Joghrāfiyāyi/Geographical researches, 58, 167-180.
Pourezzat, A. A. (2004). Tarrāhi-ye sistem-e xat-e mašygozār-e dolati barāye tahaqqoq-e edālat-e ejtemā'i bar mabnā-ye hokumat-e haqmadār-e Alavi [Designing a public policy making system to achieve social justice; Based on Alavian truth-oriented model of governance]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tarbiat Modares.
Rahbari, L., & Sharepour, M. (2014). Jensiyat va haq be šahr: Āzmun-e nazariye-ye Lofevr dar Tehran [Gender and right to the city: Examination of Lefebvre's theory in Tehran]. Majalle-ye Jāme'eŠenāsi-ye Iran/Iran Sociology, 14(1), 116-141.
Riazi, A. (2013). Šahr; Padidei miyānreštei [City as an interdisciplinary phenomenon]. Faslnāme-ye Motāle'āt-e Miyānreštei dar Olum-e Ensāni/Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 6(1), 101-115.  doi: 10.7508/isih.2014.21.005
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2012). Tahlil-e payāmhā-ye resānei [Analyzing media messages] (M. Boroujerdi Alavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Soruš.
Ritzer, G. (1996). Nazariyehā-ye jāme'ešenāsi [Sociological theory] (A. R. ghoravizad, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Mājed.
Ritzer, G., Zhao, S., & Murphy, J. (2006). Metatheory in sociology the basic parameters and the potential contributions of postmodernism. In J. H. Turne, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, Springer.
Saeedi Rezvani, H. (2012). Tabyin-e mafhum va sāxessāzi-ye šahr-e edālatmehvar; Nemune-ye arzyābi šahr-e Tehran [Conceptualization and indexing the just city; Case study: Tehran]. Tehran, Iran: Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran.
Saeedi Rezvani, H. (2014). Gozari bar šahr-e ādelāne dar nazariyehā-ye šahrsāzi va āmuzehā-ye Eslāmi [Go over just city in urbanization theories and Islamic teachings]. Šahr-e Pāydār/Sustainable City, 1(1), 135-163.
Saeedi Rezvani, H., & Nurian, F. (2009). Bāzxāni-ye edālat dar ejrā-ye tarhhā-ye šahri-ye kešvar; Nemune Meydān-e Šohadā dar Mashhad [Assessment of justice in the implementing of urban plans; Shohada Square in Mashhad]. Pažuhešhā-ye Joghrāfiyā-ye Ensāni/Human Geography Researchs, 42(68), 85-102.
seyyed razi 1999). Nahjol-balāghe Emām Ali: Xotbehā, nāmehā va soxanān-e hekmat [Nahj al-Balagha of Imam Ali (AS): Sermons, letters and words of wisdom] (H. Ansarian, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Payām-e Āzādi.
Shokoohi Bidhendi, M. S. (2014). Arzyābi-ye edālat-e fazāyi dar barnāmehā-ye towse'e-ye šahri  [Evaluation of spatial justice in urban development plans]. Tehran, Iran: Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran.
Sorensen, A. (1982). Planning comes of age: A liberal perspective. The Planner, 68(6), 184-188.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2006). Osul-e raveš-e tahqiq-e keyfi [Basics of qualitative research] (B. Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Pažuhešgāh-e Olum-e Ensāni va Motāle'āt-e Farhangi/Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Tabibian, M., Shokouhi Bidhendi, M. S., & Arbab, P. (2010). Arzyābi-ye edālat-e ejtemā'i dar tarh-e manzar-e šahri-ye mahalle-ye Xubbaxt, Mantaqe-ye 15 Šahrdāri-ye Tehran [Evaluation of social justice in urban renovation plan of Khubbakht quarter of Tehran]. Me'māri va Šahrsāzi-ye Ārmānšahr/Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(3), 111-122.
Taylor, N. (2014). Nazariyehā-ye barnāmerizi-ye šahri [Urban planning theory since 1945] (M. shourjeh, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Entešārāt-e Modirān-e Emruz.
Torabzadeh Jahromi, M. S., & Sajadie, A. R. (2011). Gunešenāsi-ye nazariyehā-ye edālat mobtani bar ab'ād-e falsafi; Raveši dar tabyin-e māhiyat-e mafhumi-ye edālat [Understanding different types of justice theories based on the philosophical dimensions: An approach to determine the theoretical nature of the justice concept]. Journal of Islamic Economic Studies, 3(6), 59-95.
Vaezi, A. (2014). Naqd va barresi-ye nazariyehā-ye edālat [Critical study of theories of justice]. Qom: Mo'assese-ye Āmuzeši va Pažuheši-ye Emām Khomeini.
Vafaeian, A., & Mansourian, Y. (2014). Čegune yek tahqiq-e moruri anjām daham? [Doing a literature review?]. Fanāvari-ye Ettelā'āt va Ertebātāt: Mafāhim va Kārbordhā/Information and Communication Technology, 17(197), 85-90.
Yiftachel, O. (1989). Towards a new typology of urban planning theories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16, 23-39. Doi: 10.1068/b160023
 
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Dadashpoor, H., & Alvandipour, N. (2017). Conceptual Typology of Justice in Urban Planning Theories based on an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 9(2), 1-27. doi: 10.22035/isih.2017.248
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 04 September 2016
  • Revise Date 11 April 2017
  • Accept Date 26 December 2016

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us