Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

The Need to Concentrate on Interdisciplinary in Science Classification Systems and Library-Bibliographical Classification Schemas: A Switch from Classical Logic to Fuzzy Logic

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Cheshmehsohrabi 1
F. Zarmehr 2

1 Associate Professor in Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD Student in Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2018.279
Abstract
Classical classification with two-value logic is the basis of most of the classification schemes, while with the emergence of interdisciplinary sciences, this has become challenging in properly determining their stance in the classification of science. The method adopted in this study is analytic consisting of document analysis and content analysis. In the first, applying the targeted sampling method, the texts and documents related to the subject are assessed and in second, 125 methods (75 science and 50 library-bibliographic classification). The information related to categories, subcategories, indicators, etc. are identified and registered in the checklists. Here, the census method is adopted. As to the 75 classification systems of science, the oldest is the Vedic classification. In relation to Bibliographic Classification Systems, 50 classification systems, they are of four categories of ancient, medieval, new and modern centuries. The study of main categories, and subcategories of classification of science systems and library-bibliographic classification systems indicate that basis of “division of science” or “division of written sources” in these systems are subject or field and interdisciplinary sciences are not considered in an independent manner. Therefore, we are faced with binary, triple, quaternary etc. in most library-bibliographic classification systems and in the classification systems of sciences, which are in fact derived from classical logic. The results of the research indicate that the interdisciplinary science fields lack an independent position in 125 classification systems. In brief, the fuzzy logic is proposed as a substitute methodology and logic in the classification of sciences and library references.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary
science classification systems
library-bibliographical classification schemas
classical logic
fuzzy logic
Subjects
Bahrani, M. (2014). Rešte, miyānrešte va taqsimbandi-ye olum [Discipline, interdiscipline and science division]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 5(2), 37-52. doi: 10.7508/isih.2014.18.003
Bayati, A., & Khandagh Abadi, M. (2011). Gozāreši az modelhā-ye tabaqebandi-ye olum [A report on science classification models]. The Journal of Strategic Studies in Islamic Sciences and Education, 4(11), 21-34.
Cheshme-Sohrabi, M., & Saadat, R. (2018). Jāygāh-e miyānrešte dar nezāmhā-ye tabaqebandi-ye elm [Interdisciplinary status in the classification systems of science]. National studies on librarianship and information organization, 29(2), 27-50.
Davarpanah, M. R. (2005). Zarurathā-ye novin-e bāznegari dar zaxire va bāzyābi-ye ettelā'āt [New requirements for data retrieval and retrieval]. Journal of Library and Information Science, 8(3), 67-88.
Davoodi, M. (1991). Moqaddamei bar janbehā-ye nazari-ye radebandi [An introduction to the theoretical aspects of the classification]. Journal of National Studies on Library and Information Organization, 2(1-4), 271-302.
Du, W.,  Xu, W., Jiang, H., & Ma, J. (2014). Fuzzy classification scheme mapping for decision making. Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland.
Elahi, Sh., & Azar, A. (1998). Manteq-e fāzi, ruykardi novin be systemhā-ye modiriyat [Fuzzy logic, a new approach to management system]. Journal of Modarres, 6, 141-160.
Fadayi Araghi, Gh. R. (2001). Tarhi now dar tabaqebandi-ye olum [A new approach to the classification of sciences]. Journal of Faculty of Literature & Humanities University of Tehran, 994, 287-308.
Golmoradi, M. (2015). Manteq-e fāzi va kārbordhā-ye ān dar zendegi-ye ruzmarre [Fuzzy logic and its uses in everyday life]. Dovvomin Hamāyeš-e Melli-ye Riyāziyāt va Kārbordhā-ye ān dar Olum-e Mohandesi [Second National Conference on Mathematics and Its Applications in Engineering Sciences], Islamic Azad University, Jubaybar Branch, Sari, Iran. 
Haghighi, M. (1987). Moruri bar radebandi-ye nazari va radebandi-ye amali [A review of the theoretical classification and practical classification]. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 39, 45-58.
Khademi Zare, H., & Fakhrzad, M. B. (2012). Šenāsāyi va tahlil-e kārbord-e manteq va systemhā-ye fāzi dar Quran-e Karim [Identifying and analyzing application of logic and fuzzy systems in the Holy Quran] . Journal of Religious New Thinking, 8(31), 79-92.
Khorsandi Taskouh, A. (2009). Miyānreštegi va masā'el-e ān dar āmuzeš-e āli [Interdisciplinarity and its issues in higher education]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(2), 85-101. doi: 10.7508/isih.2009.02.005
Kodourof, B. M. (1981). Tabaqebandi-ye dānešhā: Mafhum-e takāmol dar tārix-e dāneš [Classification of knowledge: The concept of evolution in the history of knowledge] (P. Shahriari, Trans.). Journal of Hodhod, 3(3&4), 362-368.
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2009). Molāhezāt-e asāsi dar bāb-e siyāsatgozāri-ye towse'e-ye olum-e miyānreštei dar āmuzeš-e āli az manzar-e farāyand-e takvin [Basic considerations on the policy of developing interdisciplinary science in higher education from the perspective of the developmental process]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 1-18. doi: 10.7508/isih.2009.03.001
Mostaghimi, M. (2008). Barresi-ye tatbiqi-ye nazariye-ye Ibn Sina dar bāb-e tabaqebandi-ye olum [A comparative study of Ibn Sina's theory on the classification of sciences]. Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 10(1), 175-198.
Mousavi, Gh., & Sadeghian, R. (2016). Barresi-ye manteq-e fāzi va kārbord-ye ān dar masā'el-e pičide [Investigating fuzzy logic and its application in complex problems]. Journal of Researches of the Nations, 2(15), 77-89.
Pezeshki, V., Zarafshani, K (2008). Kārbord-e manteq-e fāzi dar erā'e-ye model-e arzyābi-ye sotuh-e towse'e-ye Kešāvarzi [Application of fuzzy logic in the presentation of the model for assessing agricultural development levels]. Journal of Village and Development, 11(4), 53-70.
Pourezzat, A. A., & Gholipour, A. (2009). Towse'e-ye ruykard-e mas'alemehvari dar motāle'āt-e miyānreštei [Developing a problem-oriented approach in interdisciplinary studies]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 127-140. doi: 10.7508/isih.2009.03.006
Saroukhani, B., & Sadeghipour, Sh. (2013). Manteq-e fāzi abzāri jahat-e sāxt va sanješ-e mafāhim dar olum-e ejtemā'i [Fuzzy logic a tool for constructing and measuring concepts in social sciences]. Journal of Social Studies of Iran, 8(3), 47-64.
Shiri, S. (n.d). Xušebandi čist? [What is clustering?]. Amirkabir University of Technology. Available in: ce.aut.ac.ir/~shiry/lecture/machine.../fuzzy%20clustering.doc
Soltani, P., & Rastin, F. (1993). Estelāhnāme-ye Ketābdāri [Library thesaurus]. Tehran, Iran: National Library of the Islamic Republic.
Taeb, Z. (2007). Kārbord-e dastebandi-ye fāzi dar system-e āmuzeši-ye hušmand-e taht-e web [Application of fuzzy classification in web intelligent learning system]. Reterrived from  https://www.civilica.com/Paper-
Taheri, M. (2008). Ašnāyi bā nazariye-ye majmu'ehā-ye fāzi [An introduction to fuzzy set theory]. Mashhad: Jahād-e Dānešgāhi.
Ziaee, M., & Abbaspoor, N. (2015). Jāygāh-e nezām-e elmi-ye gardešgari: Az ruykard-e reštei tā miyānreštei [The position of the scientific system of tourism: From a disciplinary approach to an interdisciplinary One]. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 4(13), 8-28.
 
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 28 October 2017
  • Revise Date 08 October 2018
  • Accept Date 27 February 2018

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us