Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

The Evolution of the Typology of Interdisciplinary Research: A Historical-genealogical Study

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi 1
A. Khorsandi Taskoh 2
M. Arefi 3
A. Motamedi 4

1 Professor of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Educational Studies, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Educational Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD Student of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2019.2929.3266
Abstract
Interdisciplinary research has been developing dramatically in the recent two decades. Reviewing the related literature shows that such research is very important in terms of its methodology and typology. This study aims to compare, describe, and determine different categories of interdisciplinary research considering their historical trends through a documentary research approach in a way other than the ones which have been done so far. This research applies a genealogical perspective to find roots of different categorizations of interdisciplinary research despite all the existing consistency and inconsistency. It also seeks to propose a new dialogue in this regard. The study indicates an overlap between different categories of research. In addition, interdisciplinary research along with changes in the role of universities has emphasized on a structural-practical categorization rather than a structural one in the late 20th century till recent decades. In the same way, the nature of knowledge has changed from an academic one to a post-academic one.

Keywords

interdisciplinary research
structural categorization
structural-practical categorization

Subjects

درزی، قاسم؛ قراملکی، فرامرزاحد؛ و پهلوان، منصور (1392). گونه‌شناسی مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در قرآن کریم. فصلنامۀ مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 5(4)،102-73. doi: 10.7508/isih.2014.20.004
لورنزوزامورانو؛ سوزانا. (1389). اقدامات میان‌رشته‌ای بین‌دانشگاهی. در موهان، بالاساب، یادگیری و تدریس میان‌رشته‌ای در آموزش عالی: نظریه و عمل (مترجم: محمدرضا دهشیری)، پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی، تهران، ایران.
لیدمن؛ سون‌اریک (1381). تاریخ عقاید سیاسی از افلاطون تا هربرماس (مترجم: سعید مقدم). تهران: نشر اختران.
مهرمحمدی؛ محمود (1388). ملاحظات اساسی در باب سیاست‌گذاری توسعۀ علوم میان‌رشته‌ای در آموزش عالی از منظر فرایند تکوین. فصلنامۀ مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 1(3)، 18-1. doi: 10.7508/ISIH.2009.03.001
Academy of Finland (1997). Suomen tieteen tila ja taso: Ympäristön ja luonnonvarojen tutkimus [State and tandard of finnish science. Environmental and Natural Resources Research. The Academy of Finland: Helsinki,
Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57(4), 379-412. doi: 10.1177/0018726704043893
Bamme, A. (2004). Science wars: Von der akademischen Zur postakademischen wissenschaft. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt: New York.
Becher, T. (1989).Historians on history. Journal of  Studies in Higher Education,14(3), 263-278. doi: 10.1080/03075078912331377663
Bielskis, A. (2009). Power, history and genealogy: Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault. 75, 73-84.
Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213. doi: 10.1037/h0034699
Boden, M. A. (1997). What is interdisciplinarity? In Interdisciplinarity and the Organization of Knowledge in Europe (71-82), European Commission, Brussells.
Boden, M.A.(1999). What is interdisciplinarity? In: Cunningham, R. (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and the Organization of Knowledge in Europe. A Conference Organised by the Academia Europaea. Cambridge, September 24–26, 1997. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 13–24.
Boix Mansilla, V. (2006). Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 17-29.  doi: 10.3152/147154406781776075
Boon, H., Verhoef, M., O’Hara, D., & Findlay, B. (2004). From parallel practice to integrative health care: A conceptual framework. BMC Health Services Research, 4(1), 4-15.  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-4-15
Davidson, M. (Jan 27, 2004). Bones of contention: Using self and story in the quest to professionationalize higher education, an interdisciplinary approach, Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 299-310.  doi:10.1080/1356251042000216624
Davies, P., & Dunnill, R. (2006 Summer). Disciplines and the outcomes of learning in social science education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 25-31.  doi: 10.4119/jsse-348
Fuller, S. (1993). Philosophy, rhetoric and end of knowledge:The coming of science and technology studies. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison,WL.
Fuller, S. (2002). Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Funtowiez, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In R. Costanza, E. D. Herman, & J. A. Bartholomew, (Ed.). Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University Press, New York.  doi: 10.2307/1243998
Garkovich,L. (1982).A proposal for building.interdisciplinary bridges,Teaching sociology, Published by: American Sociological Association,9(2), 151-168. doi: 10.2307/1317318
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in conterporary societies (1st ed.). Sage: London.  doi: 10.4135/9781446221853
Heckhausen, H. (1972). Discipline and Interdisciplinarity. In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in universities (pp. 83-89). Paris: OECD. 
Holm, U. M., & Liinason,M. (2005). Disciplinary boundaries between the social science and humanities, A comparative report on interdisciplinary, University of Hull.
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdiscipliarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39, 79-88.  doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter-and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education, 1(1),7-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1947.tb02067.x
Johansen, N. L., & Højland, P. (2008). Thinking across disciplines - interdisciplinarity in research and education. DEA and FBE.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI, US: Wayne State University Press.
Klein, J. T. (1993). Blarring,cracking, and crossing: P and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, at al (Eds). Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarites (pp. 185-211). Chariettes vitte, VA. University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Klein, J. T. (2010). Interdisciplinary and the prospect pf complexity: The tests of theory. Issues in integrative studies, 19, 43-57.
Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In J. J. Kockelmans, (Ed.). Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education (pp. 123-160). University Park P.A.ASU.
Lattuca, L. R. (Nov 1, 2016). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. The Journal of Higher Education, 37(6), 711-739. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777178
Lattuca, L. R. (September 30, 2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinarity research and Vanderbilt university press.
Lenhard, J., Lucking, H., & Schwechheimer, H. (Jun 1, 2006). Transdisciplinarity expert knowledge, mode-2 and scientific disciplines: Two contrasting views. Science and Public policy, 33(5), 341-350.   doi: 10.3152/147154306781778876
Lenoir, Y., Larose, F., & Geoffroy, Y. (2000). Interdisciplinary practices in primary education in Quebec: Results from ten years of research. Issues in Integrative Studies, 18, 89-114.
Lynton, E. (1985). Interdisciplinarity: Rationale and criteria of assessment. In L. Levin, & I. Lind, (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity Revisited: Reassessing the Concept in the Light of Institutional Experience, Linkoping: OECD/CERI.
Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
Newell, W. H. (1998). Interdiaciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Nikitina, S. (Jun 7, 2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 389-425. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2303_3
Nilles, J. M. (1976). Interdisciplinary research and the American University. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1(2), 160-166. doi: 10.1179/isr.1976.1.2.160
Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development. (1982). The University and the Community: The Problems of Changing Relationships. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1972). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of research and teaching in universities. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Columbus, Ohio.
Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In G. Berger, A. Briggs & Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research. Proceedings of seminar on interdisciplinarity in universities, organized by the center for educational research and innovation. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Price, R.J. (1997). Evolutionary learning in program management to facilitate the adoption of research. In Australia Pacific Extension Network. Managing Change: Building Knowledge and Skills, Proceeding of the 2nd  Australasian Pacific Extension Network, APEN, Albury.
Salter, L., & Hearn, A. (1996). Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen,s University Press.
Sinclair, A., & Muffo, J. (2002). The Use of biglan,s ategories in assessing general educatin courses, Paper presented at The Annual Forum for the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Canada.
Squires, G. (1992). Interdisciplinarity in higher education in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Education, 27(3), 201. doi: 10.2307/1503449
Stember, M. (1991). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal, 28, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
Von Henting, H. (1972). Magier oder Mgister? Uber die einheit der wissenschaft in verstandigungsprozes [magician or master? on the unity of science I the communication process]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
Wilson, R. A., & Keli, F. (1999). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 23 March 2018
  • Revise Date 26 July 2018
  • Accept Date 06 September 2018

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us