Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

The art-science approach to an environmental crisis in the contemporary art discourse with the framework of Foucault’s discursive formation

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Taheri 1
E. Afzaltousi 2

1 Postdoctoral Researcher, Iran National Science Foundation, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Art Research, Faculty of Arts, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2023.5043.4860
Abstract
In achieving frameless art within the scope of conceptual one, the approach of contemporary art is to utilize the technological revolution and emphasize interaction between audience and the work of art, taking into account the environmental concepts. Ecological art, as one of the most contemporary art forms, represents a new avant-garde style through its treatment of the environmental crisis. The environmental degradation has created a common space for the actors to represent the interaction of different discourses of knowledge, including the different dimensions of science in understanding this issue. By this way, this research is necessary to explain the art-science interaction in ecological art and understand the discursive relations in contemporary art; hence, it is carried out by studying the representation of the interaction between the above two with a critical approach to the environmental crisis as well as the discursive formation in Foucault's reading of episteme. This paper tries to study the discursive formation of ecological art based on science with the assumption of the synergy of art-science as the discursive platform of contemporary art in representing the environmental crisis. The research method in explaining the discursive rules of ecological art is based on the epistemological description in the theory Foucault, which is based on library resources. Using a variety of experimental, interactive, and participatory techniques, contemporary ecological art can regenerate the discursive space of the environmental crisis through interaction between scientific institutions based on scientific research. The art-science relationship can be considered a schema of the epistemology of our time.

Keywords

contemporary art
ecological art
discourse
episteme
Foucault
Subjects
Abbasi, M., & Ariayinia, M. (2009). Archaeology of human sciences in postcolonial discourse. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 2(2), 189-212. doi: 10.7508/ijcr.2009.06.009
Ahmadvand, S., & Hamidi, S. (2014). Chāhār Revāyat dār Fahm-e Ma’nāy-e Motāleāt-e Miyānrešte’i. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(1), 31-54. doi: 10.7508/isih.2014.21.002
Baio, C., & Solomon, L. H. (2018). Culturas degenerativas: Experimentacoes em torno de uma rede. “Biohibr”da". Revista Cientí­fica/FAP, 19(2). doi: 10.33871/19805071.2018.19.2.2433
Baio, C., &Solomon, L. H. (Apr. 14. 2019). Degenerative Cultures. ClimaCom – Micelial Fabulations. Reterived from http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/?p=10933
Baio, C., Solomon, L.H. & Schwartz, J.S. (2017) Degenerative cultures: Corrupting the algorithms of modernity, In The 20th Generative Art Conference GA2017, Ravenna, Italy.
Balke, F. (2020). Episteme. In: Kammler, C., Parr, R., Schneider, U.J. (Eds.). Foucault-Handbuch. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. doi: 10.1007/978-3-476-05717-4_55
Barrett, T. (2015). Naqd-e Honar: Šenaxt-e Honar-e Moāser [Criticizing art: understanding the contemporary]. (K. Ghabraei, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Nikā. (Original work published 2012)
Bishop, C. (2006). Participation (Documents of Contemporary Art), London: Whitechapel.
Born, G., & Barry, A. (2010). Art-science. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(1), 103–119.  doi: 10.1080/17530351003617610
Bukdahl, E. M. (2018). Olafur Eliasson, art as embodied and interdisciplinary experience: In dialogue with Else Marie Bukdahl. Aesthetic Experience and Somaesthetics, 59–70. doi: 10.1163/9789004361928_006
Burns, E. (2002). Michel Foucault. (B. Ahmadi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Māhi.
Cavicchioli, R., et. al. (2019). Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17(9), 569–586. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5
Colavito, M., Satink Wolfson, B., Thode, A. E., Haffey, C., & Kimball, C. (2020). Integrating art and science to communicate the social and ecological complexities of wildfire and climate change in Arizona, USA. Fire Ecology, 16(1). doi: 10.1186/s42408-020-00078-w
Dreyfus, H. L., Rabinow, P. (2000). Michel foucaul-e Farāsooye Sāxtārgerā’i vā Hermenotik [Michel foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics] (K. Bashiriyeh, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Duncan, C. (2005). Civilizing rituals: Inside public art museums, New York: Routledge.
Duxbury, L. (2010). A change in the climate: New interpretations and perceptions of climate change through artistic interventions and representations. Weather, Climate, and Society, 2(4), 294–299. doi: 10.1175/2010wcas1053.1
Edgar, A., Sedgwick, P. (Eds.) (2008). Mafāhim-e Bonyādi-e Nāzarie’e-ye Fārhāngi [Key concepts in cultural theory] (M. Mohajer, & M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Agah. (Original work published 1999)
Foucault, M. (1961). Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961–84. In L. Sylvère (Ed.), (J. Johnston, & L. Hochroth, Trans.). New York: Semiotext.
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1969). L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Foucault, M. (2002). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
Gabrys, J., & Yusoff, K. (2012). Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold. Science as Culture, 21(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2010.550139
Galanter, P. (2016). Generative art theory. In C. Paul, A Companion to Digital Art (pp. 146–180). Portico. doi: 10.1002/9781118475249.ch5
Ghajri, H. A., & Nazari, J. 2013. Kārbord-e tahlil-e qoftemān dar tahqiqāt-e ejtemā'i. Tehran, Iran: Jāme’ešenāsān.
Golledge, N. R., Keller, E. D., Gomez, N., Naughten, K. A., Bernales, J., Trusel, L. D., & Edwards, T. L. (2019). Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt. Nature, 65–72. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0889-9
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in Feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575. doi: 10.2307/3178066
Hein, H. (1996). What is public art?: Time, place, and meaning. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54(1), 1.  doi: 10.2307/431675
Helguera, P. (2011). Socially engaged art. New York: Jorge Pinto Books.
Henderson, L. D. (1999). The large glass seen anew: Reflections of contemporary science and technology in Marcel Duchamp's “Hilarious Picture”, Leonardo, 32(2), 113-126.  doi: 10.1162/002409499553091
Henderson, L. D. (2005). Duchamp in context: Science and technology in the large glass and related. Princeton University Press.  
Henderson, L. D. (2019). Connecting thereads: Duchamp’s readymades and large glass project in context, 1913-14. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 28(57–58), 65–86. doi: 10.7146/nja.v28i57-58.114850v
Holton, G. (2001). Henri Poincaré, Marcel Duchamp and Innovation in Science and Art. Leonardo, 34(2), 127–134. doi: 10.1162/002409401750184681
Inglis, D., & Hughson, J. (2016). Jāme’e Šenāsi-ye Honar: Šivehā-ye Didan [The sociology of art: ways of seeing] (J. Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney. (Original work published 2005)
Juliao, D. (February. 20, 2018). The Large Glass by Marcel Duchamp: Analysis & Related Works. Study.com, Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-large-glass-by-marcel-duchamp-analysis-related-works.html
Kachooyan, H. (2003). foucault va dirinešenāsi-ye dāneš [Michel foucault and the archaeology of knowledge ... postmodernity]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran.
Kalantari, A. H. (2011). Goftemān Az se manzar-e zabān-Šenāxti, falsafi va jāme’ešenāxti. Tehran, Iran: Jamešenasan.
Karbasizade, A., & Saki, F. (2018). Nesbat-e ensān va xodā dar epistme’ehā-ye segāne [The relation of human being and God in the triple episteme]. Metaphysics, 10(26), 51-70. doi:10.22108/mph.2018.92978.0
Khan, Z. (Sep. 26, 2019). Michael Pinsky’s Pollution Pods at the UN stirred dialogue on climate change. Stirworld, Reterived from https://www.stirworld.com/see-news-michael-pinsky-s-pollution-pods-at-the-un-stirred-dialogue-on-climate-change
Kuchinskaya, O. (2018). Connecting the dots: Public engagement with environmental data. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 495–506. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289106
Lesaffre, M., & Leman, M. (2020). Integrative Research in Art and Science: A Framework for Proactive Humanities. Critical Arts, 34(5), 39–54. doi: 10.1080/02560046.2020.1788616
Lever-Tracy, C. (2008). Global earming and dociology. Current Sociology, 56(3), 445–466. doi: 10.1177/0011392107088238
Lippard, L.R. (Ed.) (1997). Six years: The dematerialization of the art object from 1966 to 1972 (Vol. 364). Berkeley, LA and London: university of California Press.
Locher, P. (2011). Contemporary Experimental Aesthetics: State of the Art Technology. I-Perception, 2(7), 697–707.  doi: 10.1068/i0449aap
Lucie-Smith, E. (2003). Mafāhim va ruykardhā dar āxarin jonbešhā-ye honary-e qarn-e bistom [Movements in art since 1945: issues and concepts] (A. Samie Azar, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Nazar.
Makaryk, I. (2014). Dānešnāme-ye nazariyehā-ye adabi-ye moāser [Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: approaches, scholars, terms] (M. Mohajer, & M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Āgah. (Original work published 1993)
McLuhan, M. (1997). The Relation of Environment to Anti-Environment. In Marshall McLuhan Essays: Media Research, Technology, Art, Communication, (M. A. Moos Edit.) 110–119. New York & London: Routledge.
Millet, C. (2013). Honar-e mo’āser-e tārix va joqrāfiā [L'Art contemporain: Histoire et géographie] (M. Nonahali, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Nazar.
Osborne, P. (2012).  Honar-e Mafhumi [Conceptual art: Themes & movements] (N. Rahmani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Morakabe Sefid.
Payne, M. (2000). Bārt, Foko, Āltoser [Reading knowledge: an introduction to Barthes, Foucault and Althusser] (P. Yazdanjo Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Markaz.
Perovich, L. J. (2018). Environmental art: A path to civic progress in a time of policy retreat in the United States. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1), 1523269. doi: 10.1080/23311983.2018.1523269
Phillips, C. F. (2019). Affect and the Anthropocene: the art artefact and ecological grie (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tasmania.  doi:10.25959/100.00031903
Pinsky, M, & Sommer, L. (2020). Pollution pods: can art change people’s perception of climate change and air pollution?, Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, (Special Issue 21), 90-95.
Randerson, J. (2018). Weather as Medium: Toward a Meteorological Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rashidian, A. K. (2015). Farhang-e Pasāmodern. Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Rush, M. (2008). Resānehā-ye Novin Dar Honar-e Qarn-e 20 [New media in late 20th-century art] (B. Roshani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Nazar. (Original work published 1999)
Rutten, K. (2018). Participation, art and digital culture. Critical Arts, 32(3), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/02560046.2018.1493055
Saber, Z., & Zia Shehabi, P. (2012). Tabyin-e Jonun dār honar be mosābe-ye rahāyi dar talaghi-ye Nietzsche’i-ye Foko, ba t’akid bar naqāšihā-ye Goya [Explaining Madness in art as liberation in Foucault's Nietzschean conception, with emphasis on Goya paintings]. Journal of Recognition, 66(1), 41-64.
Scott, J. (2010). Artists-Who-Care! Shared Perspectives on Social and Ethical Responsibility. Artists-in-Labs Networking in the Margins, 43–59. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0321-0_5
Scott, J. (2016). Suggested Discourses for more Art_Sci Collaborations. Artists-in-Labs: Processes of Inquiry, 24–35.  doi: 10.1515/9783990437186-005
Sippel, S., Meinshausen, N., Fischer, E. M., Székely, E., & Knutti, R. (2020). Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale. Nature Climate Change, 10(1), 35–41.  doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0666-7
Snow, C. P. (2012). The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sommer, L. K., Swim, J. K., Keller, E., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). “Pollution Pods”: The merging of art and psychology to engage the public in climate change. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101992. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101992
Sommer, L. K., Swim, J. K., Keller, E., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). “Pollution Pods”: The merging of art and psychology to engage the public in climate change. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101992. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101992
Stephens, E. (2020). Speculative biology: precarious life in art and science resurrection projects. Continuum, 34(6), 870–886. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2020.1842128
Taheri, M., & Afzaltousi, E. (2023). A phenomenological reflection on the aesthetic experience in the contemporary environmental art (Case Study: The Weather Project). Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts, 8(1), 146-160. doi: 10.22051/jtpva.2023.40526.1422
Taheri, M., & Afzaltousi, E. (2023). Recognizing the political activism of contemporary environmental art with the approach of recognizing in critical theory (Case study: Activism of Liberate Tate and the Blued Trees Symphony). Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 28(2), 31-43. doi: 10.22059/jfava.2023.349220.666992
Waite, C. T. (2019). The poetics of ice and its intimations: Ice-Time–Ice in the anthropocene. In M. Sherman (Ed.), International Opportunities in the Arts (pp. 149-173), Vernon Press Series in Art.
Waite, C.T. (Jun. 1-3, 2017). Ice-Time: Art-Science Expedition Field Report. Converge: Disciplinarities and Digital Scholarship, Reterived from https://oaks.kent.edu
Wang, L. (Apr. 26, 2018).  from around the world. Inhabitat, Reterived from https://inhabitat.com/pollution-pods-let-visitors-taste-pollution-from-around-the-world/
Ward, G. (2004). Postmodernism [Postmodernism] (Q. Faxr Ranjabr, & A. Karmi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Māhi. (Original work published 2023)
Webb, R. (March. 16, 2007). Tesseract. Wikimedia, Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlegel_wireframe_8-cell.png
Weintraub, L. (2012). To life!: eco art in pursuit of a sustainable planet. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
Wicks, R. (2010). Foucault. In B. Gaut, D. Lopes (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics (B. Mohaghegh, F. Sasani, Sh. Ahmadzadeh,  M. Sanei Darreh Beidi, M. Ghasemiyan, & A. Nojoumian, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Matn. (Original work published 2001)
Wilson, S. (2002). Information arts: intersections of art, science, and technology. Cambridge, M: AMIT Press.
Zandalinas, S. I., (2021). Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: Recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends in Plant Science, 26(6), 588–599. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 29 January 2023
  • Revise Date 19 May 2023
  • Accept Date 05 June 2023

Article View 10,021
PDF Download 2,567

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us