Requirements and preconditions for interdisciplinary theorizing

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

Professor of Political Thought, Faculty of Wrold Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Theorizing in interdisciplinary domains of the humanities and social sciences is considerably more demanding than disciplinary theorizing within these fields. Beyond a theoretical framework and research methodology—both indispensable for any form of theorizing—interdisciplinary theorizing requires a range of additional contextual, cognitive, cultural, and personal conditions. This article seeks to conceptualize and articulate these conditions as the requirements and preconditions of interdisciplinary theorizing. The central question guiding the study is: apart from theoretical frameworks and methods (which are not the focus of this article), what requirements and preconditions are necessary for interdisciplinary theorizing in the humanities and social sciences? The article classifies these requirements into four interrelated domains: scientific, cultural, cognitive, and personal. Scientific requirements pertain to principles governing knowledge production and research practices. Cultural requirements refer to institutionalized attitudes, dispositions, and modes of conduct that shape scholarly behavior and outlooks. Cognitive requirements encompass mental, linguistic, and intellectual capacities essential to theorizing. Personal requirements address the psychological traits, motivational orientations, and personality characteristics of the theorist. In this study, “requirements and preconditions” denote the capacities, competencies, and characteristics necessary for effective interdisciplinary theorizing. Methodologically, the research employs interpretive phenomenology and conceptual modeling.

Keywords

Subjects


Ahmadi, A. b. M. (1989). Ghurar-ol-hikam wa durar-ol-kalem [Exalted Wisdom and Pearls of Speech]. Qom, Iran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmī. [In Persian]
Alikhani, A. (2024a). The challenges and barriers of interdisciplinary theorizing in Iran. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 16(3), 5-28. doi: 10.22035/isih.2024.5302.5024
Alikhani, A. (2024b). Theorizing with theory and method of Arta. Tehran, Iran: Negāh-e Mo’aser.
Alikhani, A. A. (2021). Raveš-e lāye’i dar andiše pažuhi [Layered Method in Thought Studies]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Negāh-e Mo‘āser. [In Persian]
Ashouri, D. (1973). Ta‘rif-hā va mafhūm-e farhang [Definitions and the Concept of Culture]. Tehran, Iran: Āgāh. [In Persian]
Bashirieh, H. (1379). Nazariy-hā-ye farhang dar qarn-e bistom [Cultural Theories in the Twentieth Century]. Tehran, Iran: Mo’asseseh-ye Farhangi-ye Āyandeh-ye Pouyan. [In Persian]
Blaikie, N. (1399). Tarāhi-ye pažuheš-hā-ye ejtemā‘i [Designing Social Research] (H. Chavoshiyan, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Chernoff, F. (2009). Nazariye va zebar-nazariye dar ravābet-e beyn-ol-melal [Theory and Metatheory in International Relations] (A. Tayeb, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Craib, I. (2002). Nazariye-ye ejtemā‘i-ye modern: Az Parsons tā Habermas [Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas] (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Āgah. [In Persian]
Danaeifard, H. (2007). Nazariyepardāzi: Mabāni va raveš-šenāsihā [Theorizing: Foundations and Methodologies]. Tehran, Iran: SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Darzi, Gh., Gharamaleki, A.F. (2020). Methodology of Interdisciplinary Studies in Quran. Tehran, Iran: Imam Sadiq University & Shahid Beheshti University.
Dubbin, R. (1978). Theory Building. New York: Free Press.
Ebrahimi Koushk Mahdi, S., Ahanchian, M., & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2021). Evaluation of theorizing in educational administration studies based on interdisciplinary criteria. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities13(4), 1-30. doi: 10.22035/isih.2021.374
Farasatkhah, M. (2020). Mā Irānīān [We Iranians]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Gharamaleki, A. F. (2006). Raveš-šenāsi-ye motāle‘āt-e dini [Methodology of Religious Studies]. Mashhad, Iran: Dāneshgāh-e ‘Olūm-e Eslāmi-ye Razavi. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, H. (2021). Marja‘-e pažuheš [Research Reference] (19th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Andiše-Ārā. [In Persian]
Ghazi Moradi, H. (2025). Introduction to critical thinking. Tehran, Iran: Axtaran.
Gholami, M. (2020). Piri-ye farhangi va farhang-e piri [Cultural Aging and the Culture of Aging]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Andiše-ye Ehsān. [In Persian]
Gilbert, N. (1993). Research, Theory and Method. In: N. Gilbert (Ed), Researching Social Life (pp. 18-31). London: Sage.
Gioa, D. A., & Pitter, E. (1990). Metaparadigm perspective on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602
Gregor, Sh. (2005). The struggle towards an understanding of theory in information system. In: N. Dennis, & Sh.D. Gregor (Eds.), Information System Foundation: Building and Criticizing, Canberra: Australian National University.
Hosseini, S. R. (Ed.). (2008). Nazariye-pardāzi [Theorizing] (S. R. Hosseini, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Imān, M. T. (2018). Raveš-šenāsi-ye tahqiqāt-e keyfi [Qualitative Research Methodology]. Qom, Iran: Pažuhešgāh-e Hawza va Dāneshgāh. [In Persian]
Jacquart, J., & Jacoby, J. (1395). Mahārat-hā-ye nazariyepardāzi va modelsāzi [Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical] (M. Alemzade, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Jamalzade, M. (1965). Khalaqiyāt-e mā Irānīān [The Temperaments of Us Iranians]. s.l.: s.n. [In Persian]
Kaplan, M. (1969). Problems of Theory building and Theory Confirmation in international Politics. In: K. Knorr, & S. Verbal (Eds), The international system: Theoretical Essays, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Khanifar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2023). Principles and foundations of qualitative methods. Tehran, Iran: Negāh-e Dāneš.
Monadi, M. (2008). Daramad-i jāme‘e-šenāxti bar jāme‘e-paziri [A Sociological Introduction to Socialization]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Jeyhoun. [In Persian]
Mosallanejad, A. (2010). Farhang-e siyāsi-ye Irān [Political Culture of Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Farhang-e Sabā. [In Persian]
Nahj-ol-Balāġa (1951). (S. J. Shahidi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Elmi Farhangi Publications. [In Persian]
Naraghi, H. (2020). Jāme‘e-šenāsi-ye xodmāni [Everyday Sociology]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Axtarān. [In Persian]
Oberfeld, Z. (2018). Jāme‘e-paziri-ye divāni [Bureaucratic Socialization] (M. Safāyi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Elmi Farhangi Publications. [In Persian]
Popper, K.R. (1959). The Logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Poul, R. (2025). Tafakor-e enteqādi [Critical thinking] (A. Soltani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Axtarān.
Rafipour, F. (2010). Kand-o-kāvhā va pendāšteh-hā [Investigations and Assumptions]. Tehran, Iran: Šerkat-e Sahāmi-ye Entešār. [In Persian]
Repko, A. (2015). Pažuheš-e miyān-rešte’i: Nazariye va farāyand [Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory] (M. Alavipour et al., Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Sariolghalam, M. (2001). Raveš tahqiq dar olum-e siyāsi va ravābet-e beyn-ol-melal [Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations]. Tehran, Iran: Našr-e Farzān Ruz. [In Persian]
Sariolghalam, M. (2007). Farhang-e siyāsi-ye Irān [Political Culture of Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Seifzade, S.H. (2009). Theorizing in International relations and thinking frameworks. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.
Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: turning to the context of discovery. Theory and Society, 41(1), 1- 40. doi: 10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5
Tousi, Kh. (2008). Axlāq-e Nāseri (M. Minovi, & Heydari, A., Correction). Tehran, Iran: Khwrazmi.
Turner, J.H. (1991). The structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Van de Ven, A. (2013). Raveš-šenāsi-ye nazariye-pardāzi bar mabnā-ye pažuheš-e mošārekat-juyāne dar ‘olūm-e ejtemā‘i [Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research] (H. Danaei-Fard, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Enteshārāt-e Saffār. [In Persian]
Zokaei, M. S. (2023). Honar-e anjām-e pažuheš-e keyfi: Az mas’aleyābi tā negāreš [The Art of Conducting Qualitative Research: From Problem Identification to Writing]. Tehran, Iran: Āgah Publications. [In Persian]
Zokaei, M.S. (2023). The art of doing qualitetive research. Tehran, Iran: Agah.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
Volume 18, Issue 2 - Serial Number 70
Evolutions in Interdisciplinary knowledge
Spring 2026
Pages 7-32

  • Receive Date 29 October 2025
  • Revise Date 25 January 2026
  • Accept Date 12 March 2026