Explaining and modeling the thinking university in Iranian higher education: A Grounded Theory study

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 PhD Student in Higher Education Development Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

10.22035/isih.2026.5806.5341
Abstract
A thoughtful university is an institution that moves beyond instrumental functions and the mere transmission of knowledge, focusing instead on critical reflection, scholarly dialogue, and social responsibility. Given the structural challenges and the dominance of quantification in Iranian higher education, the present study aimed to develop a theoretical model of the thoughtful university within the context of Iranian higher education, drawing on the lived experiences of faculty members of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Kurdistan. The study adopted a qualitative approach using grounded theory methodology based on Strauss and Corbin’s systematic design. The research population consisted of faculty members of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Kurdistan. Using purposive sampling with a theoretical orientation, twenty faculty members were selected as the study sample. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The causal conditions identified included the search for meaning, experiences of constraints, and environmental transformations. The contextual conditions comprised faculty culture, individual characteristics, and organizational conditions. The intervening conditions included evaluation policies, university management, and the climate of interaction. In response to these conditions, faculty members adopted strategies such strengthening scholarly dialogue within the university environment, rethinking teaching and research practices, drawing the collective capacities of faculty members, and managing ways compatible with structural constraints. The consequences of these strategies were categorized as strengthening intellectual life within the university, transforming students’ educational experience, improving the quality scholarly activity, and gradually redefining role the university in society. The findings indicated the realization of the thoughtful university Iran requires a transition from rigid and quantitatively oriented structures toward reflective agency among faculty members and the creation of informal spaces for dialogue.

Keywords

Subjects

Ahern, A., O'Connor, T., McRuairc, G., McNamara, M., & O'Donnell, D. (2022). Critical thinking in the university curriculum–the impact on engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 125-132. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.666516
Aminibagh, A., & Salimi, J. (2025). Qualitative Analysis of Faculty Members' Perceptions of Creative University: A Path to Educational Innovation. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 31(2), 45-66.  https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.2.3
Aminibagh, A., Maroofi, Y., & Salimi, J. (2024). A Phenomenological Reflection on the Dimensions of Scientific Policy Making in Higher Education in Iran. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 14(47), 31-63. https://doi.org/10.22034/emes.2024.2008279.2491
Asghari, F. (2021). Exploring academic culture in Iranian higher education institutions based on grounded theory. Iranian Journal of Cultural Research, 13(4), 85–117. https://doi.org/10.22035/jicr.2021.2494.2926
Azizi, A., Salimi, J., & Tanhayee, A. (2025). An insight-based approach to higher education administration through mindfulness. International Journal of Educational Management, 39(4), 1005–1027. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2024-0722
Barnett, R. (2014). Thinking and rethinking the university: The selected works of Ronald Barnett. Routledge.‌ https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768045
Barnett, R., & Bengtsen, S. S. (2018). Introduction: Considering the thinking university. In The thinking university: A philosophical examination of thought and higher education (pp. 1-12). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bengtsen, S. S., & Barnett, R. (2018). The thinking university. A Philosophical Examination of Thought and Higher Education. Cham: Springer.
Bergsteedt, B., & du Plessis, A. (2025). Reimagining transformation through strategic thinking and accountable governance in the South African public university system. Higher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01517-w
Boni, A., & Gasper, D. (2012). Rethinking the quality of universities: How can human development thinking contribute? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 451-470.  http://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.679647
Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of distance education, 13, 1-32.
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Argüelles-Cruz, A. J., Pinal-Ramírez, O. E., Glasserman-Morales, L. D., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Carreon-Hermosillo, A. (2023). Towards the development of complex thinking in university students: Mixed methods with ideathon and artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(23), 100-186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100186
Clegg, P. (2008). Creativity and critical thinking in the globalised university. Innovations in Education and teaching International, 45(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802175982
Entwistle, N. (2017). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ferasatkhah, M. (2022). Transformation in the seven realms of higher education and its future. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14(3), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.407
Fitzpatrick, K. (2021). Generous thinking: A radical approach to saving the university. Johns Hopkins University Press.http://doi.org/10.31046/wabashcenter.v2i1.2835
Hassanpour, A., Deckman, S., Azizi, N., & Salimi, J. (2026). Intercultural competence in a homogeneous context: A phenomenological study of international students’ lived experiences in an Iranian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–16.  
Leamnson, R. (2023). Thinking about teaching and learning: Developing habits of learning with first Year College and university students. Routledge.
Miranda, F. J., Chamorro, A., & Rubio, S. (2018). Re-thinking university spin-off: A critical literature review and a research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 1007-1038. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9647-z
Moreno-Palma, N., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Cáceres-Reche, M. P. (2024). Effectiveness of problem-based learning in the unplugged computational thinking of university students. Education Sciences, 14(7), 693.
Parhamnia, F. (2021). The study of scientific thinking and reflective thinking and their relationship with research self-efficacy among post graduate students. Iranian Journal of Higher Education, 13(4), 25–38.
Paya, A., & Ebrahimabadi, H. (2022). Our expectations of universities in the next few decades: Developments in universities responsibilities and functions. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14(3), 9–48. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.4784.4697
Redding, G. (2017). Critical thinking, university autonomy, and societal evolution; thoughts on a research agenda. http://doi.org/10.5287/ora-zvo6450x9
Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339.
Salimi, J., Azizi, A., Srisarajivakul, E., & Sajadi, S. (2025). Embracing intercultural trust: Cultivating non-native teachers’ cultural humility in Iranian Kurdistan. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 27(3), 123–150.
Tian, J., & Low, G. D. (2011). Critical thinking and Chinese university students: A review of the evidence. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(1), 61-76.
Torkzadeh, M., Barzegar, B., & Mahini, F. (2021). Providing and validating a model for applying critical thinking in accounting education in universities. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 12(Special Issue), 1213-1228. 10.22075/ijnaa.2021.5628
Zakersalehi, G. (2023). Transition to a Mode 2 university: Possibilities and Impossibilities. Journal of University Studies, 2(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.22035/jous.2024.5077.1048
Zhang, L. F. (2023). Do university students’ thinking styles matter in their preferred teaching approaches?. Personality and individual differences, 37(8), 1551-1564. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.012
 Zhu, C., & Zhang, L. F. (2023). Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 361-375.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 23 September 2026

  • Receive Date 21 April 2026
  • Revise Date 19 June 2026
  • Accept Date 28 June 2026