Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Social construction of genetically modified products in Iran: A qualitative study

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

M. Moazami 1
M. Tavakol 2
Kh. Safiri 3

1 PhD Student of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran,, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2020.3650.3831
Abstract
Genetically modified products have been the site of controversy over the last two decades. The main objective of this study is to examine these claims and identify the claim makers that raise these claims.  This is a qualitative case study and data has been collected from three sources: interview with key actors in the field, the contents of three debates among the claim-makers and specialized and non-specialized texts related to the field. Research findings show two networks have been formed around genetically modified products. Each network consists of different groups and actors with a common view about genetically modified products. Network of proponents frame genetically modified products as food security, clean environment, healthy food and national production. The network of opponents frames them as risks to environment and human health and a scheme for the intrusion and manipulation of the agricultural system particularly in developing countries. The dominance of a group of frames has different consequences for society.

Keywords

genetically modified products
controversy
networks
frames
Amorese, V. (2010). From public understanding of gmos to scientists’understanding of public opinion: A case study of the listening capacity of scientists in the UK and Italy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
 Benford, R., D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brooks, S. (2005). Biotechnology and the politics of truth: From the green revolution to an evergreen revolution. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4), 360-379. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00310.x
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 196-223). London: Routledge.
Cenesta (2013). Behnejādi-e takāmuli [Evolutionary plant breeding]. Tehran: Center for Sustainable Development and Environment.
Collavin, E. (2007). Food biotechnologies in Italy: A social psychological study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinky, Finland.
Einsiedel, E. (2009). Stakeholder representation in genomics. In P. Atkinson, P. Glasner & M. Lock (Eds.), Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era. London: Routledge.
FAO. (2011). Frequently answered questions about FAO and agricultural biotechnology. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/biotech/docs/faqsen.pdf 
Feenberg, A. (2001). Questioning technology (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, OM., & Dorani, M. (2016). Vākāvi-e didgāhe motaxasesān dar xususe zarorate berenj tarārixte Irani be ĉarxehe keŝāvarzi va ghazāie keshvar  [Investigation of Agricultural Experts’ Perspectives Towards the Existence of Bt Rice in the Food and Agricultural Chain of the Country]. Agricultural Extension and Education Research/faslename pajuheŝhāie tarvij va amuzeŝ keŝāvarzi, 10(4),1-12.
Ghareyazi, B. (2006). Bāztāb vasi’e towlid-e avalin berenj-e tarārixte-ye jahān tavasote Iran [Extensive rreflection of production of the first genetically modified rice by Iran in the world]. Tehran: The Expediency Discernment Council of the System.
Iran Biotechnology News Agency(2019). Qatenāme-i pāyānie hamāyeŝ bioteknology [Final Resolution of Biotechnology]. Retrieved from Iran Biotechnology News Agency.
Iranian Biotechnology Society (2017). Viže nāme giāhān­e tarārixte [Special Issue for genetically modified plants]. Retrieved from Iranian Biotechnology Society.
Jakku, E. (2003). Murky waters? Science, politics and environmental decision - making in the Brisbane River dredging dispute (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Griffith University. Griffith. Ausatrlia.
Jasanoff, S. (2007). Design and nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States (4th ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Karami, A .(2015). Tarārixte yek nofuz-e xatarnāk ast [GM is a dangerous intrusion]. Retrieved from https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/
Kazemie, A.,H., & Abbasi, M.(2007). Mavād-e ghazāyi-e tarārixte va hoquq-e masraf-konande [Des produits alimentaires génétiquement modifiés et le droit du consommateur]. Journal of Medical law, 1(3), 163-190.
Khosh Kholgh Sima, N.A. (2017). Dalāyl movāfeqate Sāzmān Mohitzist bā tarārixte [Reason for agreement of  Department of Environment with genetically modified plants]. Isna news Agancy, Reterived from https://www.isna.ir/news/96072715546/
Kortelainen, J. (1999). The river as an actor-network: the Finish forest industry utilization of lake and river systems. Geoforum, 30(235-247).  doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00019-6
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
Levido, L. (2009). Making Europe unsafe for agbiotech. In P. Atkinson, P. Glasner & M. Lock (Eds.), The handbook of genetics and society-Mapping the new genomic era. London: Routledge.
Loseke, D. (2003).‎Negaresi now dar tahlil-e masā’ele ejtemā’i [Thinking about social problems: an introduction to constructionist perspectives] (S. Moeidfar, Trans.). Tehran, Amir Kabir.
Mabry, L. (2008). Case study in social research. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods (pp. 214-227). London: Sage Publications.
Mackenzie, D. (1978). Statistical theory and social interests: a case-study. Social Studies of Science, 8, 35-83.  doi: 10.1177/030631277800800102
Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). Introductory essay (4-25). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Mgbeoji, I. (2006). Global biopiracy: Patents, plants and indigenous knowledge. Toronto: UBC Press.
Moala, M. (2008). Jarayāne zede tarārixte, Az Došmani bā tolid tā hemāyat az vāredāt. [Anti gmo trend, from enmity with production to supporting imports]. Retrieved from Iran Biotechnology Information Center.
Mortazavi, S.E., & Pouramini, P. (2016). 52 haqiqat dabāre-ye mahsulāt-e tarārixte[52 facts about genetically modified products]. Kraj, Iran: Modirfalah.
Naeemi, A., Pezeshki Rad, Gh., & Ghareyazie, B. (2009). Barasie negareŝ motaxassesan-e bioteknoložy marākez-e dāneŝgahi ostān Tehrān dar mored-e kārbord-e giāhān tarārixte [An investigation of biotechnology experts' attitudes in university centers of Tehran province towards the use of transgenic plants]. OlomeMohitie/ EnvironmentalSciences, 7(2), 141-154.
O'Connell, B., Ciccotosto, S., & De Lange, P. (2014). Understanding the application of Actor-Network Theory in the process of accounting change. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Toronto, Canada.
Rahnema, H. (2008). Axlaq-zisti va mahsulāt-e tarārixte [Bioethics and genetically modified products].Axlaq dar oloom va fanāvari/ Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 3(1-2), 1-14.
Richards, E. (1988).The Politics of Therapeutic Evaluation: The Vitamin C and Cancer Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 18(4), 653–701.  doi: 10.1177/030631288018004004
Robins, R. (2012). The controversy over GM canola in Australia as an ontological politics. Environmental Values, 21(2), 185-208. doi: 10.2307/23240361
Salehi Jouzani, GH., &S uleymani Murche Khorti, E. (2018) Barresi vaz'iyate qavānin va moqararāt huze-ye mahsulāt-e tarārixte va imani zisti dar kešhvar [Examination of the situation of laws and regulations and biosafety in the country]. Department of Infrastructural and Production Affairs Researches: Islamic Parliament Research Center.
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Shiva, V. (1996). Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston: South End Press.
Shiva, V. (2016). Stolen harvest: The hijacking of the global food supply. Kentucky: University Press of Kentuckey.
The Management and Planning Organization (12015). Sanade barnāme-ye ŝeŝome-e towse'e-ye eqtesādi, ejtemāi va farhangi-ye Jomhouri-eEslami-ye Irān(2015-2020) [Sixth economic, social and cultural development plan's document of Islamic Republic of Iran 1395-1399]. Tehran: The Management and Planning Organization.
Veltri, G., & Suerdem, A. (2013). Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey. Public Understanding of Science, 22(2), 137-154.  doi: 10.1177/0963662511423334
Yearley, S. (2005). Making sense of science: Understanding the social study of science. London: SAGE.
Zarea Modab, S., & Alamzadeh A. (2011). Nazare mardom darbāre  mahsulāt-e hāsel a'z mohandesi genetic [The view of Bushehr's People about products from Genetic Engineering]. Journal of Biosafety. 4(1), 87-98.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 10 June 2019
  • Revise Date 20 August 2019
  • Accept Date 18 September 2019

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us