Abuali, V. (2011). Farātarkib-e natāyej-e vakāvi-hā-ye keyfi va motāleʿāt-e farhangi: vāqeʿiyat yā toham? [Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings and cultural studies: Reality or illusion?]. Barg-e Farhang, 22, 24-45. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, S., & Habibi, M. (2020). Negarishi ʿamali be ravesh-e taḥqiq-e nazariye-ye zamineh-āyi: mafhum, paradigam va vijegi-hā hamrāh bā barresi-ye yek mored-e pazhuheši [A practical approach to grounded theory research: Concept, paradigm, and characteristics with a case study]. Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research, 3(1), 1-26. [In Persian]
Alikhani, A. (2024). The challenges and barriers of interdisciplinary theorizing in Iran. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 16(3), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5302.502 [In Persian]
Alikhani, A. (2026). Requirements and preconditions for interdisciplinary theorizing. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 18(2), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5677.5250 [In Persian]
Arab, S., Ebrahimzadeh Pezeshki, R., Morovati Sharifabadi, A. (2015). Tarāḥi-ye model-e farātarkib-e ʿavāmel-e moʾasser bar ṭalāq bā morur-e nezām-mand-e motāleʿāt-e pišin [Designing a meta-synthesis model of factors affecting divorce through a systematic review of previous studies]. IRJE, 10 (4),10-22. [In Persian]
Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of Interdisciplinarity: Configurations of Knowledge and Action. Human Relations, 57(4), 379-412. https://doi:10.1177/0018726704043893
Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.
Azkia, M. & Tavakoli, M. (2006). Farataḥlil-e motāleʿāt-e rezāyat-e shoghli dar sāzmān-hā-ye āmuzeshi [Meta-analysis of studies on job satisfaction in educational organizations]. Sociological Review, 27(27), 1-26. [In Persian]
Blackie, N. (2017). Tarāhi-yi pāžūhišhā-yi ijtimāʿi [Designing Social Research] (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney. (Original work published 2000). [In Persian]
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203410028
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In N.K. Denize & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition (pp. 509- 536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Charmaz, K. (2006), Grounding Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Chenail, R. J. (2009). Bringing Method to the Madness: Sandelowski and Barroso’s Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.2820
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Introduction. In Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (pp. 1-18). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Tarḥ-e pazhuheš: roykardhā-ye kammi, keyfi va tarkibi [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches] (A. Kiamanesh, & M. Danaye Tous, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Jahad-e Danesgahi. (Original work published 2009) [In Persian]
Danaeefard, H. (2010). Raveš-šenāsi-ye pazhuheš-e kammi dar modiriat: roykardi jāmeʿ [Quantitative research methodology in management: A comprehensive approach]. Tehran, Iran: Eshraghi. [In Persian]
Darzi, Q., & Salmannejad, M. (2019). Farāyandšenāsi-ye motāleʿāt-e miyān-rishti dar pazhuheš-hā-ye Qurʾāni; nemune-ye moredi: vāژه-ye “šākela” dar āye-ye 84-e sure-ye Esrāʾ [Process analysis of interdisciplinary studies in Qur’anic research: Case study of the word “shakela” in verse 84 of Surah Al-Isra]. Quran and Hadith Studies, 51(1), 71-106. https://doi.org/10.22067/naqhs.v51i1.64891 [In Persian]
Ebrahimi, M. (2014). Barresi-ye zarurat-hā-ye motāleʿāt-e miyān-rishti dar ḥoze-ye ʿolum-e ensāni [Examining the necessity of interdisciplinary studies in the field of humanities]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 6(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2014.22.002 [In Persian]
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33 (3), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425493
Esterberg, K. G. (2001). Qualitative Research: Methods and Process (2nd ed.), London: Open University Press.
Farasatkhah, M. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and Emerging Frontiers in Science; A Study on Origins, Capabilities and Requirements of Interdisciplinarization. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2012.13.001 [In Persian]
Fatehrad, M., Jalilvand, M. R., & Mohammadzade, M. (2011). A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Challenges and motivations of Interdisciplinary Studies Implying on Interdisciplinary Methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(1), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2012.13.005 [In Persian]
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203793206
Glaser,B. (1988). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press.
Glass, Gene, V., MacGaw, B., Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research (1. print.). Beverly Hills [u.a.]: SAGE.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Irandoost, K. (2012). Daramadi bar māhiyat-e miyān-rishti-ye joghrafiyā-ye shahri va barnāme-rizi-ye shahri [An introduction to the interdisciplinary nature of urban geography and urban planning]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2012.15.001 [In Persian]
Jafarinejad, N., Moghbel Baarz, A., & Azar, A. (2014). Šenāsāyi va estenbāṭ-e moʾallefe-hā-ye asāsi-ye modiriat-e risk-e sāzmāni bā estefāde az ravesh-e faratarakib [Identifying and extracting the main components of enterprise risk management using the meta-synthesis method]. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 4(3), 85-107. [In Persian]
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational Reserch: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.
Kalantari, A., Roshanfekr, P., & Javaheri, J. (2011). Āsār va payāmad-hā-ye ṭalāq: morur-e nezām-mand-e taḥqiqāt-e anjām-shode dar Irān bā taʾkid bar molāḥeẓāt-e jensi (1376–1390) [Effects and consequences of divorce: A systematic review of studies conducted in Iran with an emphasis on sexual considerations (1997–2011)]. Woman in Development & Politics, 9(3), 111-131. [In Persian]
Kazemian, G., & Haghighi, M. (2011). Urban management in Iran’s higher educational system: assessment of its philosophy and interdisciplinary obligations. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 3(2), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2011.1011.004 [In Persian]
Kheyroddin, R. & Dalaie Milan, E. (2016). Taḥlil-e moḥtavā-ye sotooḥ-e chahār-gāne-ye ravesh-šenāsi-ye pazhuheš dar motāleʿāt-e šahrsāzi (mored-e pazhuheši: pāyān-nāme-hā-ye šahrsāzi-ye Dānešgāh-e Elm va Sanʿat-e Iran 1380–1393) [Content analysis of the four levels of research methodology in urban studies (case study: Urban planning theses at Iran University of Science and Technology, 2001–2014)]. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22(89), 107-136. [In Persian]
Khorsandi Taskoh, A. (2017). Goftemān-e miyān-rishti-ye dāneš [Interdisciplinary discourse of knowledge]. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Khorsandi Taskooh, A. (2009). Variety of Typologies in Interdisciplinary Education. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(4), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2009.04.003 [In Persian]
Khorshidi, G., & Pishgahi, S. (2012). Capacities and Obstacles for Developing Interdisciplinary Humanities. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2012.14.001 [In Persian]
Lak, A. (2014). Kārbord-e nazariye-ye zamineh-āyi dar pazhuheš-hā-ye tarāḥi-ye šahri [Application of grounded theory in urban design research]Grounded Theory Applications in Urban Design Research. Soffeh, 24(1), 43-60. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1393.24.1.4.3 [In Persian]
Mason, J. (1977). Qualitative Researching. Sage Publication. London.
Mohammadi, B. (2013). Daramadi bar raveš-e taḥqiq-e keyfi [An introduction to qualitative research methods]. Tehran, Iran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2017). Zedd-e raveš: zamineh-hā-ye falsafi va raviyeh-hā-ye ʿelmi dar raveš-šenāsi-ye keyfi [Counter-method: Philosophical foundations and scientific procedures in qualitative methodology]. Tehran, Iran: Logos. [In Persian]
Mores,J.M. (2001). Situating Grounded Theory, In, R.S. Schreider & P. Noerager Stern (eds). Using Grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer.
Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, S., Manteghi, M. & Ghazinoory, S. (2015). Farātarkib-e model-hā-ye noʿāvari-ye manteqe-i; moruri bar sāl-hā-ye 1990–2013 [Meta-synthesis of regional innovation models: A review of 1990–2013]. Innovation Management. 3(4), 25- 56. [In Persian]
Nateghpour, M..J. & Firouzabadi, S. A. (2006). Šekl-giri-ye sarmāye-ye ejtemā’i va farātahlil-e ʿavāmel-e moʾasser bar ān [The formation of social capital and meta-analysis of its influencing factors]. Sociological Review, 28(2), 160-190. [In Persian]
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153
Newell, W. (2013). The State of the Field: Interdisciplinary Theory. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies. 31. 22-43.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Rajabnejad, M,. Shirani, A., & Khazandari, S. (2006). Morur-e nezām-mand-e šavāhed [Systematic review of evidence]. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Healthcare Services. [In Persian]
Ranjbar, E., Ayatollahi Tabatabaei, Z. S., & Keshishians A. (2023). Be suy-e farāyand-e jāmeʿ-e arzeshyābi-ye keyfiyat-e fazāhā-ye omumi-ye šahri dar šahrhā-ye Iran [Toward a comprehensive process for evaluating the quality of urban public spaces in Iranian cities]. Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories, 4(1), 115-134. [In Persian]
Repko, A. F. (2012). Pazhuheš-e miyān-rishti: nazariye va farāyand [Interdisciplinary research: Theory and process] (M. Alavi-Pour, M. Karami, H. Etemadi Zadeh Derikvandi, & A. A. Nourali-Vand, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Rezapour, A., & Ranjbar, E. (2022). Jaryān-šenāsi-ye roykardhā-ye nazari-e mortabet bā fazāhā-ye šahri [Typology of theoretical approaches related to urban spaces]. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 19(107), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2021.276281.4826 [In Persian]
Riazi, S. A. H. (2014). Šahr; padide-i miyān-rešte’i [City as an interdisciplinary phenomenon]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 6(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2014.21.005 [In Persian]
Saeidi Rezvani, N., et al. (2015). Ravesh tahqiq dar motāleʿāt-e šahri [Research methodology in urban studies]. Tehran, Iran: Kasra. [In Persian]
Sandelowski M. (2008). Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 64(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04813.x
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. United States: Springer Publishing Company.
Seyed Hosseini, S., et al. (2017). Nazariye-ye zamineh-āyi dar qalamro-ye elm-e ettelā’āt va dāneš-šenāsi [Grounded theory in the field of information science and knowledge studies]. Knowledge Studies, 10 (37), 31- 42. [In Persian]
Shokati Ahmad Abad, M., & Hasani, P. (2007). Farātaḥlil chist? [What is Metanalysis?]. Modern Care Journal, 3(3), 15. [In Persian]
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models - A meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105(4), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510592352
Sohrabi, B., Yazdani, H. R., Ershadi, M. J., & Dorvash, S. (2021). Šenāxt va taḥlil-e sistemik-e metodoloži-hā-ye keyfiyat-e dāde va arāye-ye yek chārchub-e jāmeʿ (bā estefāde az ravesh-e faratarakib) [Systematic identification and analysis of data quality methodologies and proposing a comprehensive framework (using the meta-synthesis method)]. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 737-766. https://doi.org/10.52547/jipm.36.3.737 [In Persian]
Tayebi Abolhasani, A. (2019). Daramadi bar raveš-e taḥqiq: raviyeh-hā-ye estāndārd-e tahlil-e dādeh-hā-ye keyfi [An introduction to research methods: Standard procedures for qualitative data analysis]. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 09(2), 67-96. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24767220.1398.09.2.5.1 [In Persian]
Toronto, Coleen & Remington, Ruth. (2020). Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting an Integrative review. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1
Turner, B.A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Qual Quant, 15, 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164639
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Zahedi, K. (2010). Barrasi-ye farāgašt-e āmūzeš va pazhuheš-e miyān-rishti: niyāz-e diruz, roykard-e emruz, zir-sāxt-e fardā [The evolution of interdisciplinary education and research: Past need, present approach, future infrastructure]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7508/isih.2009.04.001 [In Persian]
