Evolutions in Interdisciplinary knowledge

The quarterly journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities is an open access double blind peer reviewed journal established and published by the Institute for Social & Cultural Studies affiliated to the Ministry of Science, Research & Technology. It aims to create a space of dialogue from the interdisciplinary perspective of different practical, empirical and theoretical research involved in the fields of the humanities, specially social science, and higher education. In this way, it becomes possible to confront and interpret the complex systems that underpin contemporary society. The journal is available both in print and online.  

Advantages:

Open access: ISIH is an open access journal and all articles published are freely available to scientific researchers, research scholars and the general public.

Full peer review: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo peer review with at least two independent referees.

Open Acess

Beyond mechanistic models: Interrogating three core challenges facing interdisciplinary studies in the humanities

Pages 5-6

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.570

Ghasem Darzi

Abstract Interdisciplinarity, as a response to the increasing complexity of human issues, has evolved from an academic ideal into an imperative in contemporary research, particularly within the humanities. The publication of this special issue, featuring seven selected articles that are the product of a lengthy process of evaluation and refinement, presents a valuable opportunity to discuss not only the achievements in this field but, more profoundly, the structural and epistemic challenges confronting such studies. What unites these articles and other pioneering theoretical works is their effort to move beyond mere celebration of this approach and enter the domain of its critique and pathology. In this journey, three fundamental challenges warrant consideration:

1.The Challenge of 'Integration': From a Unifying Ideal to Pluralist Realities
The concept of 'Integration' has for decades been considered the canonical cornerstone of successful interdisciplinary work (Rana et al., 2025; Frodeman et al., 2017). This perspective, rooted in the ideal of the unity of science, viewed success as the merging of concepts, methods, and epistemic frameworks from different disciplines. However, as seen in some of the most recent research in the field (Barry, 2020; also: Darzi, 2019) and discussed in the present article titled "Dis-integration: A Pathology of Integrative Cross-Disciplinary Models," this absolute necessity is being re-examined. Cases such as the successful collaboration in evolutionary game theory demonstrate that profound and transformative exchange between disciplines can occur without leading to their negation and complete unification (Grüne-Yanoff, 2016). Accordingly, each discipline can be transformed through this dialogue while retaining its methodological identity. This raises fundamental questions: Is integration the sole aim of all interdisciplinary research? Or can we speak of 'symbiotic successes' without complete integration? Engaging with this question, also referenced in the article "Explaining and Categorizing the Contemporary-Making Current in Theoretical Interdisciplinary Studies," is one of the distinguishing features of this issue.

2. The Challenge of the Theory-Practice Gap: From Mechanistic Processes to the Complex Lived Space
The second challenge stems from the apparent gap between the abstract level of interdisciplinary theorizing and the tangible yet ambiguous reality of research in practice. Prevailing models of the interdisciplinary research process (Repko, 2021) often outline linear, mechanistic steps, as if convergence could be achieved through a standard, prescriptive protocol. This view reveals the rigidity and lifelessness inherent in many of these models. In contrast, the reality of interdisciplinary research, as evidenced by the ethnographic study of the Chilean climate science center (Undurraga et al., 2023) and the article "Examining the Methodology of Comparative Qualitative Content Analysis," is replete with ambiguity, daily negotiation, cultural-epistemic differences, and creative adaptations. Success in this space stems less from following a predetermined template and more from communicative capacities, resilience, and collaborative work in confronting productive dissonances . This gap has rendered the methodologies taught in textbooks often inadequate for guiding researchers through the turbulent field of real-world interaction with other disciplines—a problem directly addressed by the article "The Attitudinal and Methodological Requirements and Imperatives of Interdisciplinary Theorizing."
3. The Challenge of the Disconnect Between Theorists and Field Practitioners
A direct consequence of the previous challenge is the creation of a profound divide between two communities: on one side, theorists and philosophers of interdisciplinary studies who analyze key concepts, and on the other, field researchers who, in practice and to solve concrete problems, inevitably traverse other epistemic domains (Moran, 2002). For the latter group, abstract discussions often seem esoteric, impractical, and lacking immediate necessity. This disconnect has led to a situation where a researcher, relying on intuition and general understanding, may conduct deep and successful interdisciplinary work without the slightest familiarity with the specialized literature of this field. This duality is clearly traceable in the distinction between the theoretical discussions presented in the article "A Pathology of Orientalists' Interdisciplinary Studies on the Ecology and Environment of the World" and the practical, applied necessities raised in the article "An Interdisciplinary Approach to Reading the Sense of Place from the Perspectives of Architecture and Cinema." This distance deprives theory of the richness of practical experience and strips practice of deeper theoretical insights.
The articles compiled in this special issue each respond, in their own way, to part of these threefold challenges, all signaling a move beyond mere description and into a phase of critique and solution-seeking. As emphasized in the systematic review by Rana et al. (2025) on doctoral education and underscored by Klein (2021), our task as a scholarly community is not to ignore these tensions but to acknowledge, study, and manage them. We must move towards a state where active epistemic work and sustained dialogue between disciplines replace rigid, pre-conceived models. This special issue is a step on this difficult yet essential path, with the hope of serving as a bridge between thinking about interdisciplinarity and living it within the complex, dynamic space of contemporary science.
 

 

Interdisciplinary

Requirements and preconditions for interdisciplinary theorizing

Pages 7-32

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5677.5250

Ali Akbar َAlikhani

Abstract Theorizing in interdisciplinary domains of the humanities and social sciences is considerably more demanding than disciplinary theorizing within these fields. Beyond a theoretical framework and research methodology—both indispensable for any form of theorizing—interdisciplinary theorizing requires a range of additional contextual, cognitive, cultural, and personal conditions. This article seeks to conceptualize and articulate these conditions as the requirements and preconditions of interdisciplinary theorizing. The central question guiding the study is: apart from theoretical frameworks and methods (which are not the focus of this article), what requirements and preconditions are necessary for interdisciplinary theorizing in the humanities and social sciences? The article classifies these requirements into four interrelated domains: scientific, cultural, cognitive, and personal. Scientific requirements pertain to principles governing knowledge production and research practices. Cultural requirements refer to institutionalized attitudes, dispositions, and modes of conduct that shape scholarly behavior and outlooks. Cognitive requirements encompass mental, linguistic, and intellectual capacities essential to theorizing. Personal requirements address the psychological traits, motivational orientations, and personality characteristics of the theorist. In this study, “requirements and preconditions” denote the capacities, competencies, and characteristics necessary for effective interdisciplinary theorizing. Methodologically, the research employs interpretive phenomenology and conceptual modeling.

Interdisciplinary

Amalgam, hybridity, and rituals: Overlooked concepts in the analysis of disciplinarity integration patterns

Pages 33-61

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5603.5198

Masoud Salmani Bidgoli, Hamidreza Namazi

Abstract Contemporary academic research increasingly addresses problems that exceed the analytical capacity of a single discipline and therefore require diverse forms of disciplinary interaction. Although multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity have been widely examined, the quality and logic of knowledge integration within these frameworks remain in need of more precise conceptual clarification. This article focuses on three relatively underexplored yet fundamental concepts—hybridization, amalgamation, and interdisciplinary rituals—and aims to develop an analytical framework for a deeper understanding of disciplinary integration processes. The study adopts a qualitative approach based on conceptual analysis and a systematic review of relevant theoretical literature, with key works selected purposively for their conceptual relevance to disciplinary interaction models. The findings indicate that hybridization represents an in-between and often unstable mode of interaction among disciplines, enabling dialogue and cognitive exchange without full integration. In contrast, amalgamation refers to deeper and more stable forms of knowledge integration that result in the emergence of new wholes with novel properties. Furthermore, interdisciplinary rituals, understood as recurring practices in collaborative research contexts, play a significant role in stabilizing shared language and fostering collective research identity. The analysis demonstrates that the analytical application of hybridization and amalgamation is largely confined to the frameworks of multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity. A clear distinction between these concepts contributes to the theoretical refinement and qualitative evaluation of integrative research practices.

Interdisciplinary

Explaining and classifying the discourse of contemporization in interdisciplinary theoretical studies

Pages 63-104

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5418.5077

Nasrin Saljoughi, Hassan Rezaei, Hero Farkisch

Abstract In interdisciplinary studies focused on contemporization, a comprehensive model that accounts for all its existential dimensions is still lacking. Accordingly, this article aims to explain and classify the discourse of contemporization within interdisciplinary theoretical studies, assess the capacities (strengths and weaknesses) of various academic disciplines in understanding and adapting to the process of contemporization, and examine the impact of integrating different fields of knowledge—through an interdisciplinary approach—on enhancing the understanding of contemporization.This study employs content analysis using an inductive reasoning approach, combined with a systematic literature review. A quantitative–qualitative content analysis was conducted on Persian-language sources related to contemporization. Based on frequency, the reviewed studies are categorized into four domains: architecture and urban planning, art, religion, and literature. Each domain contains subcategories that are thematically aligned with the main research topic. Among these domains, architecture and urban planning—having the highest number of core topics—has played a pioneering role in this field. Another major contribution of this study is the presentation of a model for the discourse of contemporization.The findings indicate that contemporization is an uneven process, as the pace at which different fields of knowledge adapt to contemporary developments varies, leading to asynchronicity and, consequently, incompatibility. Although individual disciplines demonstrate limited capacity for comprehensively understanding the process of contemporization on their own, interdisciplinary interaction at three levels—fundamental, methodological, and applied—enhances the overall capacity of the system. The four scientific domains can contribute to the process of contemporization in two fundamental ways: first, by redefining the dialectical relationship between tradition and modernity within their specialized fields; and second, by acting as cultural translators that render abstract concepts of modernity into a language accessible to society.

Interdisciplinary epistemology

A review of comparative qualitative content analysis methodology

Pages 105-136

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5449.5100

Nourallah Nourani, Ali Alaei

Abstract This article introduces and systematizes a novel qualitative research method termed Qualitative Comparative Content Analysis (QCCA). Conceptualized as a fully qualitative and inter-paradigmatic approach grounded in abductive logic, QCCA integrates inductive meaning discovery with deductive theory-driven analysis through a unified comparative protocol. The method is developed using a qualitative–developmental research design, based on a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of methodological literature published between 2000 and 2025. The resulting framework is operationalized in five analytical stages: data preparation, hybrid coding (open and directed), fuzzy normalization and multi-layered comparison, interpretation, and representation of findings. To assess its analytical capacity, QCCA is applied to a comparative case study of the concept of security in the works of Émile Durkheim and Jacques Derrida. The findings indicate that QCCA enables systematic comparison of meanings across divergent paradigms while preserving qualitative integrity and avoiding causal reductionism. Overall, QCCA offers a structured and reproducible model for qualitative comparative analysis, while further refinement of fuzzy calibration and validation criteria is recommended.

Architecture

An interdisciplinary approach to reading the sense of place from the perspective of architecture and cinema

Pages 137-161

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5550.5162

Elnaz Abizadeh

Abstract The sense of place, as an inherently interdisciplinary and multilayered concept, occupies a central position in understanding human lived experience. This study adopts a qualitative approach and employs comparative analysis to examine the factors that shape the sense of place within the realms of architecture and cinema. By leveraging the analytical capacities of interdisciplinary inquiry, it proposes a comprehensive framework for interpreting this phenomenon. The primary objective of this research is to explicate the common foundations of sense of place within an interdisciplinary approach. This study serves as an example of applying an interdisciplinary approach in the humanities, contributing both to the development of interdisciplinary research methodology and to a deeper understanding of the concept of sense of place. In this regard, three levels, physical, activity-based, and semantic, have been selected as the main dimensions of analysis. The results demonstrate that despite the media differences between architecture and cinema, the mechanisms of sense of place formation in both domains follow a similar pattern and lead to an integrated experience through the interaction of physical, behavioral, and semantic elements. This research emphasizes the synergistic capacity of architecture and cinema in creating meaningful and narrative-oriented spaces, and introduces the interdisciplinary approach as an effective tool for understanding the complexities of place experience in contemporary cultural and social contexts.

Ecological Civilization

Critical assessment of orientalist studies on ecology and the environment in the Islamic world: An interdisciplinary approach

Pages 163-189

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5575.5181

Abbas Ahmadvand, Somayeh Nise

Abstract Interdisciplinary studies of ecology and the environment in the Islamic world require a comprehensive and pluralistic approach due to the region’s cultural, geographical, and historical diversity. This article examines the shortcomings and limitations of Orientalist scholarship in this field, identifying the key challenges and opportunities it presents. Drawing on ecological theories, anthropology, historiography, and sociology, the study seeks to develop a deeper understanding of the interactions between Islamic societies and the environment throughout history. The findings demonstrate that many existing studies remain confined to specific geographical and cultural contexts and rely on traditional analytical frameworks that have failed to adequately capture the real complexities of environmental issues in Islamic societies. The article further emphasizes the need to articulate a new ecological perspective that takes into account environmental processes as well as their cultural and social impacts. It argues that interdisciplinary collaboration can foster a more nuanced understanding of pressing environmental challenges and contribute to improved responses. Ultimately, the study highlights the necessity of innovative and interdisciplinary approaches to analyzing environmental issues in the Islamic world and promoting sustainable development across the region. As a point of departure for future debates on environment and ecology, this article aims to contribute to the identification and resolution of environmental problems.

Law

The Fetus’s Right to the Privacy of Genetic Data

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 15 February 2026

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5640.5224

Mahnoush Karami, hosein zarvandi

Abstract Recent advances in genetics, particularly prenatal technologies such as Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), have enabled the analysis of fetal genetic data. Owing to their unique characteristics—such as individuality, lifelong permanence, hereditary nature, and predictive capacity regarding health status—these data represent the most sensitive form of personal information. Unauthorized disclosure may lead to identity, social, and legal risks. This study, adopting a jurisprudential–legal approach and a comparative analysis of Iranian regulations and international instruments, examines the foundations of protecting the privacy of fetal genetic data. Findings indicate that Islamic jurisprudential principles, including the prohibition of undue surveillance, the “no-harm” rule, and the principle of trust, together with international standards such as the GDPR, can provide a coherent framework for safeguarding such data. Moreover, the formulation of independent regulations in Iran is necessary, emphasizing informed consent by the legal representative, restrictions on data processing, data security, prohibition of genetic discrimination, and the principle of data sovereignty. The novelty of this research lies in linking the foundations of Islamic jurisprudence with domestic legal rules and international standards to articulate the fetus’s right to genetic data.
Keywords: Privacy, Genetic Data, Fetus, Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian Law, GDPR, Prenatal, Data Protection, Informed Consent, Genetic Discrimination

Interdisciplinary

Explaining the Phenomenon of Engineering Graduates’ Migration from the Perspective of Grounded Theory

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 01 February 2026

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5689.5264

Zahra Sanati, Mohammad Hassani, Reza Fathi

Abstract Given the increasing trend of engineering graduates’ migration in recent years, the aim of the present study is to explain the phenomenon of engineering graduates’ migration. This research employed a qualitative approach based on Grounded Theory. The participants included faculty members in engineering and sociology from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, as well as experts and managers in the field of engineering. Using purposive sampling, individuals rich in relevant experiences and information were selected in line with the research objective, and data collection continued through in-depth, semi-structured interviews until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis was conducted through qualitative content analysis in three stages—open, axial, and selective coding—using MAXQDA 20 software. A total of 429 open codes were extracted, and through conceptual similarity and commonalities, main categories and subcategories were identified and placed within the paradigm model of Grounded Theory. The results indicate that the factors underlying the phenomenon of engineering graduates’ migration include, in causal conditions: push factors of the origin and pull factors of the destination; in contextual conditions: migration facilitation factors; in intervening conditions: migration support factors; and in strategies: intra-university damaging factors and extra-university deficiency factors. Ultimately, the main consequence of the migration phenomenon among engineering graduates is the weakening of the country’s technical and developmental capacities.

Futures Studies

Scenario planning for futures of education system of Iran taking account growing capabilities of Artificial Intelligence

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 14 February 2026

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5542.5159

omid khodabakhshian, Ali Asghar Pourezzat, ebrahim mazari

Abstract In this article, with the aim of examining the future scenarios of education system of Iran, taking into account the growing capabilities of artificial intelligence, an attempt has been made to visualize clear images of the future of this technology at the level of education in the country. The participating community was selected from among experts, professors, and scientific experts through a purposeful non-probability sampling method. The data collection method was also based on library and field studies. In this article, in the first step, 35 drivers were identified through library studies. Then, using literature analysis tools, Likert scale, interviews with experts, and MiqMaq software, 18 drivers were identified as influential drivers and 4 of them were identified as key drivers. After determining the importance and uncertainty of these drivers, finally two drivers, "interactive learning" and "teacher-student collaboration", were selected as the main axes of scenario writing. Accordingly, four scenarios with the titles " Smart Era”, “Conservative Choices”, “Reckless Dehumanization” and “Alienated Human” were developed using the GBN method. In the “Smart Era” scenario, Iranian education, by utilizing interactive learning and active human participation, becomes a platform for cultivating creativity, strengthening critical thinking, and realizing educational justice. In contrast, the “Reckless Dehumanization” and “Alienated Human” scenarios provide serious warnings about the gradual elimination of the human role, the disconnection of communication, and the dominance of machine approaches in the educational process. The “Conservative Choices” scenario also shows that even if technology and educational interaction are utilized, in the absence of human cooperation, real transformation in the educational system will not occur; an issue that is consistent with the.

Philosophy

Filmic Thought Experiments and Ethical Dilemmas in Borderline Situations (A Case Study of Black Mirror)

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 28 January 2026

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2026.5703.5272

Mohsen Karami, Fateme Alavi

Abstract This article examines the philosophical potential of Black Mirror as a narrative medium for generating cinematic thought experiments—experiments that do not unfold merely through abstract reasoning, but rather through layered storytelling, visual form, and the viewer’s affective involvement. The central focus lies on those episodes that construct what moral philosophy has termed boundary situations (Grenzsituationen): moments of existential disorientation, collapse of meaning, and the urgent need for ethical choice under extreme conditions. Drawing on key concepts from existential philosophy (Jaspers, Heidegger), contemporary virtue ethics (Nussbaum), and the phenomenology of alterity (Levinas), the paper argues that episodes such as White Bear (2013), Be Right Back (2013), White Christmas (2014), and Nosedive (2016) are not merely representations of moral crises, but immersive ethical experiences. These episodes place the viewer within the ethical dilemma itself, transforming them from passive observer to engaged moral agent—one who undergoes the cognitive and emotional tensions proper to such ethical encounters. As a result, the viewer is prompted to reflect on the contours of moral experience in liminal situations while also cultivating their own moral imagination and affective responsiveness. Methodologically, the article employs philosophical-narrative analysis, focusing on the interplay between moral imagination, audiovisual storytelling, and the affective-cognitive responses of the viewer.

Managing Values ​​in Science: Explaining the Necessity of Establishing Institutions and Interdisciplinary Collaborations

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 09 June 2025

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2025.5533.5149

Fateme Hadipour, Mostafa Taqavi

Abstract Until the late twentieth century, scientific activity was often considered independent of non-cognitive factors. However, in the last few decades, many studies have challenged this notion and shown that science is also influenced by non-cognitive factors, including values. However, the problem is that the interference of values ​​can have undesirable consequences such as weakening scientific objectivity, reducing public trust, and harming democratic ideals; therefore, providing a solution that can prevent these consequences is one of the important topics in the field of science and values. The aim of this article is to explain this problem, examine and criticize existing solutions in this field, and provide a solution for it. The proposed solution emphasizes the need for the establishment of an institution and interdisciplinary cooperation; because it is shown that this problem has scientific, philosophical, and social aspects, and the appropriate solution must be able to respond to all of them. Achieving such a response is only possible through the establishment of an institution that enables interdisciplinary collaborations and assumes responsibilities at three theoretical, executive, and supervisory levels to counter the undesirable consequences of value interference.

Philosophy

Human Moral Responsibility Towards Technology. Rereading Hans Jonas's Theory

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 14 September 2025

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2025.5527.5146

hadis zarei, reza rezazadeh, Alireza Hasanpour

Abstract Abstract:

In the contemporary era, technology has evolved beyond being merely a tool at the service of humanity; it has become a force with the potential to fundamentally alter nature, society, and the destiny of mankind. Characteristics such as relentless expansion, boundless power, and long-term, often unpredictable consequences have transformed technology into a unique yet perilous phenomenon. Alongside the countless opportunities that technology has provided for human progress, it has also introduced threats such as environmental degradation, social instability, and the endangerment of future generations. In response to these transformations, Hans Jonas proposed the "Principle of Responsibility," emphasizing that humanity can no longer make decisions without considering their technological ramifications. According to Jonas, ethical responsibility entails a conscious commitment to a future that is more vulnerable than ever. The unprecedented expansion of technology forces humanity to look beyond immediate and individual interests, holding us accountable for the global and long-lasting effects of our actions. From this perspective, the relationship between technology and ethical responsibility is an inseparable and fundamental one. It is a connection that, in its essence, underscores that the survival of humanity and the Earth depends on a deeper understanding of the consequences of technological actions and a commitment to principles that prioritize the preservation of life, nature, and core human values.



Keywords: Humanity, Technology, Ethical Responsibility, Consequences, Risks

Educations

Fundamental Assumptions, Principles, and Concepts in the Pedagogical Approach of “Life-Aligned Learning and Education”

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 21 September 2025

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2025.5549.5166

mohammad mehdi khosravi olya, seyed mehdi sajadi, alireza sadeghzade, AbdolAzim Karimi

Abstract This article, adopting an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approach inspired by integral ecology, cultural ecology, and deep ecology, and influenced by the idea of integral education and pre-modern worldviews, delves into the fundamental assumptions, principles, and concepts of Iranian culture. When harmoniously integrated, these elements can lead to the creation of a unified and alternative educational approach, enabling an effective transition through contemporary ecological mega-crises for Iranians. This transdisciplinary harmonious integration has been endeavored by employing the methodological possibilities of problem-solving known as “design thinking.” Using “arts-based research,” this paper argues that pre-modern civilizations’ understanding of the “ongoing flow of the sacred in nature” led to a lasting relationship with the complex ecosystem network of life surrounding local communities. The primary goal of this research is to propose a “regenerative learning and education approach” that is “aligned with life.” This is achieved through recreating the profound interaction and connection between humans and the ecosystem of life, thus paving the way for the regeneration of ecosystems, with a focus on Iran’s local ecosystems.

Interdisciplinary epistemology

A (deep) relational reflection on knowledge through the flat ontology; A co-disciplinary epistemological and methodological framework and implications for spatial planning

Volume 16, Issue 3, Summer 2024, Pages 29-74

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5230.4981

R. Moussavi Khorshidi, M.H. Sharifzadegan,

Abstract In recent times, various "relational views" based on the "principle of complexity" have emerged as alternatives to essentialist approaches, collectively referred to as the "relational turn". However, the philosophical foundations of these views are often ambiguous, leading to potential confusion with "relativist perspectives" or "interactive views" informed by Habermas' Communicative Action. Contemporary scholarly concerns in the humanities and social sciences -such as new emphasis on materiality, embodied practices, affects and intuition, spatiotemporality, post-humanism, and even the co-disciplinary- to understand human-societal processes, stem from "relational thought" but lack proper elucidation of their ontological and epistemological underpinnings. The article employs the Synthesis Research Method to comprehensively analyze and categorize "relational perspectives" based on their ontological roots to address these issues. Moreover, it seeks to elaborate a "co-disciplinary and (deep) relational epistemological and methodological framework" by utilizing "general epistemic components" and "key components of the (deep) relational view based on flat ontology". From this viewpoint, knowledge possesses multiple, heterogeneous, mediated, and contextual nature, drawing from the intertwined resources of "conscious subjectivity" (conscious deliberation or reflexivity) and "objectivity" (external environment). Furthermore, unconscious mediators, such as "collective ideal" (culture and discourse) and "individual embodied" (psychophysical characteristics) mediators, play an essential role in shaping knowledge. Knowledge exhibits uncertain and contingent boundaries, and is in a perpetual state of "becoming". Drawing inspiration from Latour, the methodology is premised on developing "assemblage/deployment programs". Importantly, the epistemic framework can apply to a wide spectrum of fields, from humanities and social sciences to art, spatial planning, and public policy, with the potential to promote single disciplines into co-disciplinarity and co-disciplines into trans-disciplinarity.

Interdisciplinary

The transtheoretical modeling of the constructivist-interpretative paradigm in explaining the environmental issues

Volume 16, Issue 1, Winter 2024, Pages 5-36

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5136.4911

M.J. Zahedi Mazandarani, S. Salehi, S. Tahmasebi

Abstract As an interdisciplinary subject, the study of the environment requires an integrated approach. As a matter of fact, a number of thinkers in this field have used the constructivist approach to study the environmental issues because this emphasizes the role of social factors along with technical and ecological ones in explaining them. With a transtheroretical approach, the aim of the present article is to study the constructivist-interpretative paradigm and determine its cognitive aspects as well as provide a model to study the environmental issues. The paper uses Ritzer's meta-theorizing as a tool to achieve the aforementioned goals. The findings of the study of the intellectual evolution of the constructivism paradigm in classical and contemporary thoughts show that the philosophical foundation of this paradigm is intertwined in the thought of philosophers who emphasize the study of interactions between objects and subjects. This school of sociology is based on the theories of Schutz, Weber, Heidegger, Berger and Luckmann, who studied interactions and social contexts. In the sociological domain, for social issues, specifically environment, thinkers such as Spector and Kitsuse, Loseke, Hannigan, and Yearley used the constructivist perspective to study the discovery, emergence and success of these issues. With the formation of absolute and textual schools in constructivism, this approach turns from pure subjectivism to simply objective and subjective factors. As such, many other thinkers with an integrated insight pointed to multiple levels of social realities as mentioned by Ritzer. The results show that the connection and interaction of environmental issues at principal levels of the paradigmatic model of environmental realities in the constructivist-interpretive theory.

Maths in Literature

Mutual explanation of the permeability of poetry and mathematics in teaching and conceptualizing each other

Volume 16, Issue 4, Autumn 2024, Pages 5-33

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5185.4950

Majid Adib

Abstract Undoubtedly, education and especially providing new and effective methods in education is one of the most important needs and concerns of any country in the contemporary world. The purpose of this paper is to show that, contrary to the fact that apparent poetry, literature and mathematics are very far from each other and unrelated, they have taste connections in different ways. In this paper, taking into account a descriptive-analytical method, while reviewing the rise and fall of this bond, the author discusses the ontology, reasons and similarities of poetry and mathematics. Also, by presenting examples, an attempt is made to show how poetry and mathematics can, to some extent, be effective and permeable in understanding and scrutinizing each other. The findings indicate that it is possible to benefit from the collaboration between of these two fields ​​in education at high schools and colleges.

Futures Studies

The role of values in Futures Studies; Guidelines for enhancing research quality

Volume 17, Issue 2, Spring 2025, Pages 101-143

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2025.5478.5116

Shahriar Shirooyehpour, Morteza Anoosheh, Safar Fazli, Mohammad Aniseh, Einollah Keshavarz Turk

Abstract In recent decades, philosophers of science have focused on how science is influenced and structured by values. This view stands in contrast to the ideal of "value-free science," which views the intrinsic involvement of non-cognitive values in scientific practice as destructive. However, today, there are many criticisms of this ideal, and it is referred to as a "bad ideal." It is now widely accepted that values and value judgments are involved in various ways of scientific practice—from selecting research projects to evaluating and accepting scientific results. This issue holds even greater importance in futures studies as a value-laden science, given its humanistic and interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary nature, which seeks to shape and construct the future. Accordingly, this article examines the role and influence of values in futures studies to clarify which forms of value involvement are legitimate and which are not. To address this question, two approaches are adopted: first, proposing a typology of values based on their goals, and second, distinguishing between the direct and indirect roles of values. Then, an attempt is made to adapt these approaches to the futures studies literature. Finally, we argue that considering these aspects can provide futurists with a framework for understanding the role and structure of values, potentially enhancing the quality, credibility, and authority of futures studies.
Keywords: desert, merit, entrepreneurship, duoethnography
In recent decades, philosophers of science have focused on how science is influenced and structured by values. This view stands in contrast to the ideal of "value-free science," which views the intrinsic involvement of non-cognitive values in scientific practice as destructive. However, today, there are many criticisms of this ideal, and it is referred to as a "bad ideal." It is now widely accepted that values and value judgments are involved in various ways of scientific practice—from selecting research projects to evaluating and accepting scientific results. This issue holds even greater importance in futures studies as a value-laden science, given its humanistic and interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary nature, which seeks to shape and construct the future. Accordingly, this article examines the role and influence of values in futures studies to clarify which forms of value involvement are legitimate and which are not. To address this question, two approaches are adopted: first, proposing a typology of values based on their goals, and second, distinguishing between the direct and indirect roles of values. Then, an attempt is made to adapt these approaches to the futures studies literature. Finally, we argue that considering these aspects can provide futurists with a framework for understanding the role and structure of values, potentially enhancing the quality, credibility, and authority of futures studies.

Sociology

Conditions for the emergence and formation of the discourse of "Iranian civilization" in the historical context of the modern era

Volume 16, Issue 4, Autumn 2024, Pages 63-99

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5283.5013

Reza Parsamoghadam

Abstract The central question of this paper is to investigate the historical conditions that enabled the emergence and formation of the discourse surrounding "Iranian civilization." In other words, what specific historical circumstances could facilitate the emergence of this particular form of discursive narrative (as opposed to others), and through which accumulations and concentrations of discourse has this new discursive system been produced and sustained up to the present moment? In this regard, the issue will be examined as an initial moment in the birth and development of discursive narratives (zero degree), focusing on the organizing cores of the knowledge-power system that led to the establishment of the theoretical foundations of "Iranian civilization." This analysis will be framed within Michel Foucault's archaeological methodology. By identifying and analyzing this zero-degree discourse, the initial and homogeneous moments of this narrative can be revealed, which are characterized by a lack of differentiation. This approach is reminiscent of Foucault's methodology in History of Madness. Following this process, a new discursive order emerges as a direct result of the accumulation and concentration of propositions surrounding this discourse. Specifically, this accumulation pertains to racially charged [Aryan], anti-Arab, and antiquarian propositions that emphasize a longing for a return to the lost grandeur and magnificence of ancient Iran as central signifiers within the discourse of "Iranian civilization. The concentration of these propositions around the narrative has generated a new discursive order that did not exist at zero degree. This discursive order is characterized by a dualistic formulation of Aryan [Iranian] and Semitic [Arab] as the theoretical foundation for Iranian civilization, thereby laying the groundwork for the emergence of this narrative. Prior to the emergence and hegemonization of Aryan nationalist and anti-Arab discourses—dominant within Iranian romantic nationalism that mourned for lost greatness—such a discursive order based on an Aryan-Semite dichotomy did not exist. This dichotomy later became established as a theoretical foundation for "Iranian civilization," specifically within contemporary narratives about Iranian civilization.

Sociology

A systematic review of studies on body and politics in contemporary Iran

Volume 16, Issue 2, Spring 2024, Pages 5-33

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2024.5118.4900

M.S. Zokaei, M. Amanpour

Abstract From the Naserite era until now, the body has always been the issue of disputes, conflicts and competition between social groups, political parties and different discourses in Iran. Despite this, studies of the body, in general, the relationship between the political system and the body in Iran, in particular, is a new domain that has not received serious attention from academic circles in the country. The present article is a systematic review of the researches accomplished in this field over the last two decades. Such a study, in addition to providing an analysis of approaches, methods, issues, and findings of these studies, and reviewing the weaknesses and strengths of the existing research, can identify the neglected fields in this domain and lead to a deeper understanding of the issue of the body as a social and political construct in the contemporary Iranian society. As such, relying on the analysis of the content and themes of the available sources, we are looking for a systematic analysis of the problematic, study tradition and methodology of these studies. The findings show that the most basic problem of these researchers is to study the role and place of the body in the process of nation building and modernity in Iran, or the body as a factor of conflict between power (political sovereignty) and Iranian social groups and activists. Also, the tradition of sociology with two theoretical approaches, post-structuralist and structuralist, can be considered as the dominant approach in the studies of politics and the body in Iranian social sciences during the last two decades..

Social Sciences

What is criticism in social sciences, A theoretical study

Volume 17, Issue 3, Summer 2025, Pages 5-40

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2025.5510.5132

Reza Safari Shali, Affan Khodamoradi, Elham Sakhaei

Abstract Social criticism is considered one of the most fundamental concepts in modern social sciences, which has played a pivotal role in the analysis of power structures, dominant ideologies, and social representations since the Enlightenment. The present study, relying on the documentary method and a qualitative approach, analyzes and compares four prominent schools of thought - the Frankfurt School, feminism, post-colonial studies, and post-modernism - that have been more loyal to the social critical movement than other schools of thought, in relation to social criticism. The data were collected through a systematic review of theoretical texts and previous studies and examined with an analytical approach. The results of this analysis show that although these schools differ in terms of epistemological foundations, methodology, and historical origins, they all consider criticism to be a political, revealing, and liberating act that aims to deconstruct dominant discourses and challenge the status quo.Based on these analyses, the present study extracts five key components of social criticism—politicalness, exposure, liberation, focus on the underdog, and social construction of reality—that are considered in all four schools of thought, and provides a theoretical framework for analyzing and evaluating critical discourses. The present study has attempted to present a structured picture of the nature and function of social criticism in the theoretical context of contemporary schools of thought through case analyses.
 

Keywords Cloud

Related Journals