This study indicates that essential perceptions and scholarly conceptions in social sciences are remarkably distinguished from each other. They are individualism, holism, collectivism, and systemism. It further deals with the point that socio-economic factors and institutions have a causative interrelation. An independent and isolated study of these institutions can never give a true and proper understanding of these issues. This goal is not achievable but through synthetic and interdisciplinary conceptions including holistic, and systemic methods.
Shabani,A. (2011). Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2(3), 161-190. doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.007
MLA
Shabani,A. . "Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism", Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2, 3, 2011, 161-190. doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.007
HARVARD
Shabani A. (2011). 'Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism', Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2(3), pp. 161-190. doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.007
CHICAGO
A. Shabani, "Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism," Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 2 3 (2011): 161-190, doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.007
VANCOUVER
Shabani A. Reciprocity of Holistic and Individualistic Methods , Comparative Analysis of Interdisciplinary Studies versus Traditional Neoclassicism. ISIH, 2011; 2(3): 161-190. doi: 10.7508/isih.2010.07.007
