Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities

Providing models for socialization of educational spaces relying on the Constructivism Approach and production of space

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

R. Nikravesh 1
G. Islami 2
J. Sabernejad 3
A. Kalantari 4

1 PhD in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2023.3721.3887
Abstract
This research focuses on the expansion of educational spaces compatible with the teacher-centered method that has caused the lack of improvement of these spaces with the student-oriented instruction methods. The hypothesis is that by applying constructivist approaches and theories of social production of space, school environments can be designed to enhance students’ interactions and active participation in learning that ultimately increases their motivation for education. The research is descriptive-analytical in nature and follows a qualitative and interdisciplinary approach as well as uses a developmental method. The educational spaces of three purposefully selected schools are analyzed using various theories. The analysis results in the identification of five types of educational spaces that can support the application of constructivist methods of instruction and promote students' social interactions. The proposed spatial structure includes classroom sets, public spaces, and common areas, aiming to create a spatial convergence and fluidity that prevent spatial disarray. The intention is to move away from teacher-oriented spaces and towards more flexible and open environments that foster social interactions and student engagement. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of how educational spaces can be adapted to facilitate the student-oriented instruction and promote constructivist learning approaches. The findings offer insights into the design principles that can enhance students' motivation and active participation in the education process.

Keywords

spatial production
educational spaces
Constructivism
socialization

Subjects

Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London, England: Reaktion Books.
Dangel, R.J., & Guyton, E. (2004). An Emerging Picture of Constructivist Teacher Education. The Constructivist, 15 (1).
Dariush, B., Jalili Sadrabad, S., Taghavian, N., & Mohammadi-ojan, Sh. (2019). Tadvin-e osul va mabāni tarāhi-ye rizfazāhāye dānešgāh bā ta’kid bar avāmel-e farhangi va ejtemā’i [Codification of the Principles and Basics of Designing Higher Educational Spaces with an Emphasis on the Cultural and Social Factors]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 11 (2), 181-151.
DCFS. (2007). Project Faraday: Exemplar designs for science. London, England: Department of Children, Schools and Families.
Dudek, M. (2007). Schools and Kindergartens: A Design Manual. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
Fardanesh, H. (2001). Bāznemāyi-e dāneš dar ruykard-e yādgiri-e sāxtgerāyi va delālathā-ye ān barāye tarāhi āmuzeši [Knowledge Representation in the Structural Learning Approach and Its Implications for Educational Design]. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 3 (3 & 4), 124-107.
Fardanesh, H. (2008). Tabaqebandi-ye olguhā-ye tarāhi-ye sāzandegerā bar asāse ruykardhā-ye yādgiri va tadris [Classification of Constructivist Design Patterns by Learning and Teaching Approaches]. Educational Studies and Psychology, (2), 21-5.
Fardanesh, H. (2013). Tarāhi-ye āmuzeši: Mabāni, ruykardhā va kārbordhā [Instructional Design: Foundations, Approaches, and Applications]. Tehran, Iran: Samt Publications.
Fielding, S. (2000). Walk on the left! Children's geographies and the primary school. In S. L. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children's geographies: playing, living, learning. London, England: Routledge.
Fisher, K. (2002). Schools as 'prisons of learning' or, as a 'pedagogy of architectural encounters': A manifesto for a critical psychological spatiality of learning. Adelaide, Australia: Flinders University of South Australia.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. UK: Vintage Publication.
Giles, J., Ryan, D., Belliveau, G., De Freitas, E., & Casey, R. (2006). Teaching style and learning in a quantitative classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(3), 213-225. doi: 10.1177/1469787406069055
Grout, L., & Wang, D. (2017). Ravešhāye tahqiq dar me’māri [Research Methods in Architecture] (Translated by Alireza Einifar). Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran.
Han, H., Kiatkawsin, K., Kim, W., & Hong, J. (2017). Physical classroom environment and student satisfaction with courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (47), 1-10. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1299855
Harvey, D. (2016). Spaces of Hope (Translated by Alireza Jabbari (Azarang)). Tehran, Iran: Thought criticism publishing company.
Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and Learning Lessons in Architecture 3. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
Hooshyari, M. M., Pournaderi, H., & Fereshtehnejad, S. M. (2013). Gunešenāsi-ye masjed-madrese dar me’māri-ye eslāmi-ye irān, Barresi čegunegi-ye ertebāt miyān-e fazā-ye āmuzeši va niyāyeši [Typology of Mosque-School in Islamic Architecture of Iran Investigating the Relationship Between Educational and Prayer Space]. Iranian Architectural Studies, (3), 54-37.
Islami, S.Gh. (2014). Dars goftār-e mabāni-ye nazari-ye me’māri: eynakemān rā xodemān besāzim [Lessons on Architectural Theory Let Us Make Our Own Glasses]. Tehran, Iran: Royal Architecture Science.
Islami, S.Gh., & Ghodsi, M. (2013). Ruykardi eslāmi be tarāhi-ye model-e sāxtārmand-e nezām-e amuzeš-e me’māri [An Islamic Approach to Designing a Structured Model of Architectural Education System]. Kimiya-ye-honar, 2 (7), 92-79.
Islami, S.Gh., & Naghdbishi, R. (2010). Tose’e-ye keyfi-ye amuzeš-e me’māri dar ofog-e 1404 [Qualitative Development of Architectural Education in Horizon 1404]. First National Conference on Education in Iran. Sharif University of Technology, Science, Technology and Industry Policy Institute.
Ismaili, A., Shahcheraghi, A., &Habib, F. (2019). Vākāvi-ye ta’sire me’māri dāxeli en’etāfpazir bar ta’in-e fazā-ye šaxsi dānešāmuzān dar madrese [Analysis of the impact of flexible interior architecture on the students’ personal space at schools]. Educational Innovations, 18 (70), 161-147.
Javan, J., Dalil, S., & Salmani Moghadam, M. (2014). Diyālektik-e fazā az manzar-e lowfevr [The dialectic of space from Lefebvre's perspective]. Geographical studies of arid regions, 3(12), 1-17.
Kalantari, A.H., & Sediqi Kasmaei, M. (2017). Az motālebe-ye haq be šahr tā šeklgiri-ye enqelāb-e šahri (šahr-e Tehrān, sāl-e 1357) [From Demanding the Right to the City to the Formation of the Urban Revolution (Tehran, 1979)]. Urban Sociological Studies, 7 (23), 96-71.
Kar, D., Fostermacher, J.D., Richardson, V. (2006). Advanced teaching methods (Translated by Hashem Fardanesh). Tehran, Iran: Kavir Press.
Kaviani, H., & et al. (2018). Čārčub-e nazari-ye kelās-e ma’kus: Tarsim-e ešārehāyi barāye yādgiri-ye farāgirmehvar [Reverse Classroom Theoretical Framework: Drawing Gestures for Inclusive Learning]. The Basics of Education, 7(2), 59-78.
Khodabakhshi, S., Foroutan, M., & Samiei, A. (2015). Baresi seyr-e tahavol-e fazāye me’māri madāres bar asās-e arzyābi-ye naqš-e nezām-e āmuzeši-ye hākem bar ānhā (nemune-ye moredi: madrese-ye sepahsālār, dārolfonun va dabirestān-e alborz) [The Evolution of Space in Schools Architecture Based on the Role of Their Govering Educational System (Case Study: Sepahsalar School, Darolfunoon, and Alborz Hifg School)]. Garden of Nazar, 12 (37), 74-61.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (2008). The Production of Space. Oxford, England: Wiley Blackwell.
Lippman, P.C. (2007). Developing a theoretical approach for the design of learning environments. International Conference of Design Education.
Lippman, P.C. (2010). Evidence-based design of elementary and secondary schools. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Mahdavinejad, M. J., Ghasempour Abadi, M. H., & Mohammadlouye Shabestari, A. (2013). Gunešenāsi-ye masjed-madresehāye dore-ye Qājār [Typology of mosque-schools of the Qajar period]. Iranian Islamic City Studies, (11), 5-15.
Mahmoudi, F., Fathi Azar, E., & Esfandiari, R. (2009). Barresi-ye rābete-ye mizān-e mošārekat-e fa’āl-e dānešāmuzān dar jaryān-e tadris bā pišraft-e tahsili [Investigating the Relationship between Active Student Participation in Teaching and Academic Achievement]. Journal of Educational Studies and Psychology, 10 (3), 82-65.
Mansouryar, Z., & Jalalian, S. (2017). Afzāyeš-e ta’āmolpaziri dānešāmuzān az tariq-e erteqā’e keyfiyat-e fazāyi va kālbodi dar madāres-e fani va herfe’i (motāle’e-ye moredi: honarestān-e šahid sādelji dar šahrestān-e kabudar-āhang) [Studying Students Interoperability with Each others by Enhancing Space & Physical Quality in Technical & Professional (Case Study: Sadelgi School in Kabudarahang)]. Environmental Studies Seven Fences, 6 (20), 80-67.
Massey, D. (1999). Power geometrics and the politics of space-time. Heidelberg, Germany: University of Heidelberg.
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. US: Sage.
McGregor, J. (2004). Spatiality and the place of the material in schools. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(3), 347-372. doi: 10.1080/14681360400200207
Mirzamohammadi, M.H., & et al. (2011). Tabyin-e delālathāye ma’refatšenāxti-ye ruykard-e sāzandegerāyi dar arzešyābi-ye pišraft-e tahsili [Explaining the epistemological implications of the constructivist approach to evaluating academic achievement]. Daneshvar, (45), 127-140.
Moein Mehr, S., & Majidi, V. (2022). Ŝenāsāyi-ye me’yārhāye tarāhi me’māri-ye madrese mobtani bar nazariye-ye harekat-e johari-ye Molāsadrā be masābe-ye āmel-e mo’aser dar šeklgiri-ye hoviyat-e ensān (barresi-ye panj nemune az madāres-e mo’aser dar irān) [Identifying School Architectural Design Criteria Based on Mulla Sadra’s Theory of Substantial Motion as an Effective Factor in the Formation of Human Identity (A Case Study of Five Contemporary Schools in Iran)]. Quarterly Journal of Basic Human Sciences Research, 8 (2), 101-132.
Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulateion strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37-44. doi: 10.2307/30035524
Nosrati, S., Sabzali, M., Heidari, A., Sarfi, T. & Sabbar, S. (2020). Chatbots, counselling, and discontents of the digital life. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 4(2), 153-172.
Ramli, N., Ahmad, S., & Haji Masri, M. (2013). Improving the classroom physical environment: classroom user’s perception. Social and Behavioral Sciences, (101), 221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.195
Santrock, J.W. (2004). Educational Psychology. New York, US: McGraw-Hill.
Sarfi, M., Darvishi, M., Zohouri, M., Nosrati, S. & Zamani, M. (2021). Google’s University? An exploration of academic influence on the tech giant's propaganda. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 5(2), 181-202.
Sarmad, Z., Bazargani Harandi, A., & Hejazi, E. (2011). Ravešhā-ye tahqiq dar olum-e raftāri [Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences]. Tehran, Iran: Agah.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schwartz, K. (2014). Report finds deeper learning model improves outcomes for all students. Mindshift what is deeper learning?. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Shaari, M. SH., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Physical learning environment: Impact on children school readiness in malaysian preschools. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222(23), 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.164
Strommen, E., & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology and the future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society, 24(4), 466-476. doi: 10.1177/0013124592024004004
Tabatabaei Molazi, F., & Sabernejad, J. (2016). Ruykard-e tahlili-ye nahve-ye (čidemān-e) fazā dar edrāk-e peykarebandi-ye fazāyi-e maskan-e bumi-ye qešm (nemune-ye mowredi rustā-ye lāft) [The Space Syntax Analytical Approach in Understanding the Configuration of Qeshm Vernacular Housing (Case Sudy: Laft Village)]. Housing and Rural Environment, (154), 88-75.  
Turkame, A. (2015). Darāmadi bar towlid-e fazā-ye hānri lowfevr [An Introduction to the Production of Space of Henry Lefebvre]. Tehran, Iran: Tisā.
Turner, J.H. (2003). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Wadsworth, United States: Wadsworth Publishing.
Zarghami, I., & Behrooz, S.M. (2015). Nagš va mafhum-e fazā dar bāzāfarini-ye nazariye-ye me’māri, olum-e ejtemā’i [Space and its Role in Recreating Architectural Theory and Social Science]. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 7 (2), 99-81.
Zenuzi Mohseni, H. (2009). Teknowlowži-ye āmuzeši [Educational Technology]. Tehran, Iran: Yastarun Publications.
Zieleniec, A. (2015). Fazā va nazariye-ye ejtemāi [Space and Social Theory] (Translated by Mahmoud Shorche). Tehran, Iran: Parham Naghsh Publications.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M.  (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628. doi: 10.3102/00028312023004614
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
 
 
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 26 September 2022
  • Revise Date 07 January 2023
  • Accept Date 04 February 2023

Home

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Reviewers

Submission

Contact Us